What are the main arguments put forward in The Spirit Level by Pickett and Wilkinson?
- A-Level, IB
- AQA, Edexcel, OCR, IB, Eduqas, WJEC
Last updated 8 Feb 2023
"The Spirit Level" by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett argues that greater income inequality within countries is linked to a wide range of social and health problems, including higher levels of violence, mental illness, drug abuse, obesity, and poor educational achievement.
The authors argue that unequal societies are characterized by greater stress, insecurity, and competition, which can have a negative impact on health and well-being. They also argue that greater income equality can lead to a more cohesive and stable society, with better outcomes for everyone, regardless of income.
The main arguments put forward in "The Spirit Level" are:
- Social costs of inequality: Greater income inequality is associated with a wide range of negative social and health outcomes, including higher levels of violence, mental illness, drug abuse, obesity, and poor educational achievement.
- The negative effects of inequality are not limited to the poorest members of society, but are experienced by the entire population, including the rich.
- Unequal societies are characterized by greater stress, insecurity, and competition, which can have a negative impact on health and well-being.
- Greater income equality can lead to a more cohesive and stable society, with better outcomes for everyone, regardless of income.
- The benefits of greater income equality extend beyond improved health and well-being, to include reduced crime, better educational outcomes, and a more stable and cohesive society.
The authors argue that policy changes aimed at reducing income inequality, such as progressive taxation, improved social security systems, and better access to education and healthcare, can have a positive impact on health and well-being for all members of society.
Criticisms of the Spirit Level
The Spirit Level by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett has been the subject of much criticism and debate. Some of the main criticisms of the book are:
- Causality: Critics argue that the correlation between income inequality and social problems does not prove causality. They claim that other factors, such as culture, family structure, and individual behavior, may play a more significant role in determining social outcomes.
- Data Quality: Critics have raised questions about the quality and reliability of the data used in the book, and the methods used to analyze it. Some have argued that the authors selectively use data to support their argument and ignore evidence that contradicts it.
- Cross-Country Comparisons: Critics argue that comparing countries with very different cultural, political, and economic systems can be misleading. They claim that such comparisons may not accurately reflect the complex relationships between inequality and social problems.
- Policy Recommendations: Critics argue that the policy recommendations made in the book, such as progressive taxation and increased social spending, may not be effective in reducing income inequality or improving social outcomes.
- Limited Evidence: Some critics argue that the evidence presented in the book is limited and does not provide a complete picture of the relationship between income inequality and social problems. They claim that more research is needed to fully understand the complex relationships between these variables.
Despite these criticisms, The Spirit Level has been widely discussed and has had a significant impact on the debate about income inequality and its social and health impacts. The book has been widely cited by policymakers, academics, and the media, and has contributed to a growing interest in the issue of income inequality and its impact on society.