Topic updates
Study finds that fracking benefits Republican candidates
22nd August 2016
Voters in US congressional districts that experience shale oil and gas booms are more likely to kick out Democrat politicians and replace them with less environmentally friendly Republicans. That's the key finding of research by Viktar Fedaseyeu, presented at the annual congress of the European Economic Association in Geneva in August 2016.
His study analyses US election results since fracking began in the United States in 2003, and finds that the probability that a district would change its representative rose from 16% to 29%. But the change favours only one party: losses by Democrats increase by almost 23 percentage points, whereas shale booms have no effect on Republican incumbents, as longstanding Democrat voters switch sides. The new office-holders vote more conservatively on environmental protection, tax policies, civil rights and labour policies.
The author explains: 'Republicans, traditionally representing business interests, have supported fracking, while Democrats, traditionally representing environmental interests, have been more negative. As a result, local residents in shale areas may have increased their support for Republicans.'
You might also like
Trudeau or Bieber? Battle of the Justins
23rd October 2015
Myanmar's election through infographics
15th November 2015
By-Election quiz - lesson starter
4th December 2015
Blockbusters! An interactive resource on Elections
8th January 2016
Election Time in the Emerald Isle
3rd February 2016
Elections 2016: Local Elections - Key Areas for the Parties
20th April 2016
5 Key Charts from the 2015 General Election
18th April 2017