In the News
Parental investment in kids - a case of information failure?

11th April 2017
Many parents believe that the time they spend with their kids is more valuable the older they are, and that investing time later isn't as useful if they invested early – both of which are wrong, according to research by Teodora Boneva and Christopher Rauh, presented at the Royal Economic Society's annual conference at the University of Bristol in April 2017.
Their study analyses the results of two surveys of 538 and 1,707 parents in England, which gave them three hypothetical levels of support that they could offer, and asked them to predict how much money the child would be earning by age 30. Parents believed that an additional weekly hour of invested in their young children increases earnings at age 30 by 5.1%, whereas an equivalent weekly hour invested later raises future earnings by 8.5%.
Compared with actual figures, parents overestimate the effectiveness of late time investment by a factor of two. They also perceive the returns to investing time later to be lower if they gave their kids early support, while empirical evidence has shown early and late investment to be complementary.
The authors comment: ‘Policies that target parents’ beliefs about the productivity of parental investments, are likely to be effective in raising child outcomes. Our findings also suggest that policies that target parental beliefs are most likely to benefit children from low socioeconomic backgrounds and have the potential to reduce gaps in achievement.’
You might also like

Building the Entrepreneurial State
2nd April 2015

Science does not always make sense
13th January 2016

Over-educated grads are bad news for economic theory!
27th September 2016

Predatory Universities and A Level Grades
24th August 2017
Nudging behaviour to save water
26th February 2018

Optimum “health tax” for meat calculated
8th November 2018

Education in Niger
10th June 2021