In the News
Chris Giles: Scientists should take lessons from economists on virus response
25th March 2020
"Economics can tell you that efforts to fine tune the progression of coronavirus will fail."
My article of the day comes from Chris Giles at the Financial Times.
For many years, economists have suffered a degree of science envy linked to the gap between the types of experiments that scientists can run the in lab contrasted with the highly uncertain behaviour of agents in non-linear economic systems.
But economics has changed in recent years - although perhaps not as much as we could and should have done - partly in response to the fallout from the Global Financial Crisis.
Economists now draw more heavily on biology, physics, behavioural psychology, anthropology and sociology in trying to build models that don't assume hyper-rationality.
Are some of the scientists involved in shaping UK government policy now making similar mistakes to the economics profession a decade or more ago?
Here is a great quote from the article: "Economics can tell you that efforts to fine tune the progression of coronavirus will fail."
Please do read more to find out why.
You might also like
Cass Sunstein on Ten Common Behavioural Nudges
19th October 2014
Can Nanny make you stop drinking?
8th October 2014
How useful is economics? Nobel winner Al Roth
24th August 2014
The Economics of the Blockbuster
13th August 2014
Paul Craven: The Magic of Behavioural Economics
24th June 2014
A fine nudge? Singapore MRT vs London Tube
24th April 2014
Rising Residential Segregation, but Less Racial Prejudice: How Can This Be?
28th November 2013
Irrational Exuberance and Twitter shares
20th October 2013