Study Notes

Key Case | Crown River Cruises Ltd v Kimbolton Fireworks Ltd (1996) | Nuisance– Duration of the Interference

A-Level, BTEC National
AQA, Edexcel, OCR, IB, Eduqas, WJEC

Last updated 4 Sept 2022

Under the law of nuisance, where the use of land results in physical damage to the claimant’s property, even a one-off event of a relatively short duration may amount to nuisance.


Claimant: River barge owners

Defendant: Kimbolton Fireworks Ltd

Facts: A firework display took place on the River Thames to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Battle of Britain. The claimants owned two barges permanently moored near the location of the display, during the display a wedding party was aboard one of the barges. Failing firework debris caused a small fire aboard one of the barges.

Outcome: Liable in negligence

Legal principle: Whilst the outcome was a successful claim in negligence, within the judgment it was commented ‘in my opinion, the holding of a firework display in a situation where it is inevitable that for 15-20 minutes debris, some of it hot and burning, will fall upon nearby property of a potentially flammable nature creates a nuisance actionable at the suit of a property owner who suffers damage as a result.’

Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks (1996) | A-Level Law | Key Case Summaries | Tort

© 2002-2024 Tutor2u Limited. Company Reg no: 04489574. VAT reg no 816865400.