Study Notes
Do takeovers improve economic efficiency?
- Level:
- A-Level, IB
- Board:
- AQA, Edexcel, OCR, IB, Eduqas, WJEC
Last updated 21 Mar 2021
A study note looking at some of the arguments for and against the statement that takeovers help to improve economic efficiency.
Key points:
- Many takeovers are driven by managerial motives
- Most mergers / takeovers are cleared on competition grounds – but the Three-O2 Merger was blocked by European Commission (May 2016)
- Market structure following a takeover is perhaps less important than the actual behaviour of firms in terms of pricing, non-price competition etc.
- Horizontal integration is most likely to raise concerns about the concentration of market power
- But most industries are contestable with a threat of fresh competition + some disruptive smaller entrants
Arguments in support - benefits from takeovers
- Economies of scale from horizontal integration (productive efficiency)
- Higher supernormal profits lead to increased R&D spending and more innovation (dynamic efficiency)
- Firms with monopoly power still face competition in contestable markets (charging allocatively efficient prices)
Counter-arguments
- Increased market power can lead to X-inefficiency (managerial slack, waste)
- Risks of diseconomies of scale (rising long run AC)
- Many takeovers fail to achieve forecast cost gains
- Growing number of de-mergers points to limited impact of takeovers on overall economic efficiency
You will find more statistics at Statista
You might also like

Hearing Aids Merger Under CMA Investigation
6th December 2022

Musk buys Twitter - will he suffer the winners' curse?
28th October 2022
Key Diagrams - Monopoly and Productive Efficiency
Topic Videos
Key Diagrams - Monopoly and Allocative Efficiency
Topic Videos
UK Economy - Policy Focus - Productivity
Topic Videos
Explaining Community (Social) Surplus
Topic Videos
Takeovers - Clear The Deck Key Term Knowledge Activity
Quizzes & Activities
Google Acquires Fitbit
2nd November 2019