In the News
Trump’s Tariff Gambit: Economic Fallout from a New Trade War

1st February 2025
Donald Trump’s decision to impose sweeping import tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China—some of the United States’ largest trading partners—has sparked fears of a fresh trade war. With a 25% tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico and a 10% levy on imports from China, this move marks a significant escalation in Trump’s long-standing trade agenda.
The Economics of Tariffs: Who Pays the Price?
Trump has long argued that tariffs will force foreign countries to “pay” America for its trade imbalances. However, economists overwhelmingly dispute this idea. A tariff is simply a tax on imported goods, paid by U.S. importers—not foreign governments. When American businesses bring in goods from abroad, they must pay the tariff to the U.S. government, and they often pass these costs onto consumers through higher prices.
If Trump’s new tariffs take effect, prices on everything from cars to household appliances to groceries will rise for American consumers. Tariffs on Canada and Mexico could be especially disruptive, as supply chains in North America are deeply intertwined. Many goods, particularly automobiles, are manufactured across all three countries before reaching their final destination.
Trump’s tariffs aren’t just about economics—they’re also about geopolitics. The president has framed his decision as a way to pressure Canada and Mexico to do more to stop illegal immigration and drug trafficking. However, these countries are unlikely to concede without a fight.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has vowed to respond with “forceful but reasonable” countermeasures, while Mexico has signaled that it is prepared to retaliate with its own duties. China, which has been engaged in a prolonged trade conflict with the U.S. since Trump’s first term, has also promised to “firmly defend” its interests.
Retaliatory tariffs from these countries could target politically sensitive U.S. industries. Canada, for example, could impose tariffs on U.S. agricultural products such as orange juice, dairy, and beef—potentially hurting American farmers. Mexico, which has become the U.S.’s largest source of imports, could strategically hit U.S. manufacturing and energy exports.
The Inflation Risk: Tariffs and the Cost of Living
One of the biggest economic risks of new tariffs is inflation. At a time when many American households are already struggling with high living costs, increased tariffs could make everyday goods even more expensive.
Trump has argued that tariffs “don’t cause inflation” but rather “cause success.” However, historical evidence suggests otherwise. The tariffs he imposed on China during his first term led to price increases for American consumers and disruptions in supply chains.
When tariffs are placed on essential goods—such as steel, aluminium, semiconductors, and energy—their impact ripples through the economy. Higher input costs for businesses can lead to reduced production, layoffs, and slower economic growth. The financial markets have already responded with concern; after the White House announced the new tariffs, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 0.75%.
Why Target Mexico and Canada? The Trade Deficit Puzzle
One of the more perplexing aspects of Trump’s new tariff strategy is his decision to target Canada and Mexico. In his first term, Trump’s trade war was primarily focused on China. However, since the introduction of tariffs on Chinese imports, numerous U.S. businesses have shifted their supply chains—buying more from Mexico instead of China.
Today, Mexico has overtaken China as the top exporter to the U.S., and the trade deficit with Mexico has been growing. This matters because Trump sees trade deficits as a fundamental economic problem—even though most economists view them as a natural result of globalisation and revealed consumer preferences.
Instead of reducing imports altogether, Trump’s previous tariffs on China simply rerouted trade. Many Chinese goods now enter the U.S. through third countries, particularly Mexico. This has raised concerns in the White House that tariffs on Mexico may be necessary to prevent what Trump sees as a “backdoor” for Chinese exports.
The Broader Economic Impact: More Than Just Trade
While the immediate effects of tariffs will be felt in higher prices and potential trade retaliation, there are broader economic consequences as well. Increased protectionism can discourage foreign investment, disrupt supply chains, and reduce economic efficiency.
Many American manufacturers depend on global supply chains to remain competitive. If tariffs increase costs, businesses may either raise prices for consumers or move production offshore entirely—ironically undermining Trump’s goal of boosting domestic manufacturing.
Moreover, trade wars tend to create uncertainty in financial markets. If investors fear prolonged economic disruption, they may pull back on investment, leading to slower growth and job losses.
The Bottom Line: A Risky Economic Gamble
While protectionist policies may play well politically, they come with real economic risks. History suggests that tariffs tend to raise consumer prices, disrupt businesses, and provoke retaliation from trading partners.
As the world watches how Canada, Mexico, and China respond, one question looms large: will this latest trade war lead to the “success” Trump envisions, or will it simply tax American consumers and businesses—without delivering meaningful economic gains?
Glossary of Key Economic Terms
- Tariff – A tax imposed on imported goods, usually paid by the importer, which can lead to higher consumer prices.
- Trade Deficit – When a country imports more goods and services than it exports, resulting in a net outflow of money.
- Supply Chain – The network of suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors that produce and deliver goods to consumers.
- Inflation – The rate at which prices for goods and services increase over time, reducing purchasing power.
- Retaliatory Tariffs – Counter-tariffs imposed by another country in response to tariffs levied against them.
- Protectionism – Economic policies aimed at restricting imports to protect domestic industries, often through tariffs or quotas.
- Globalisation – The increasing interconnectedness of economies through trade, investment, and technology.
- Economic Efficiency – The optimal allocation of resources to maximize production and consumer welfare.
Game Theory and the Tariff Standoff: A High-Stakes Game of Chicken
Trump’s tariff strategy can be analysed through the lens of game theory, particularly the game of chicken—a classic model where two players speed toward a collision, and the one who swerves first loses.
If neither player gives in, both face disastrous consequences.
In this case, the U.S. and its trading partners—Canada, Mexico, and China—are racing toward a potential economic crash, each hoping the other will concede first.
Trump’s aggressive tariff threats are designed to pressure other countries into making trade concessions, but if Canada, Mexico, and China retaliate instead of backing down, both sides suffer economic harm.
The optimal outcome, from a cooperative game theory perspective, would involve negotiation and compromise. However, given Trump’s past willingness to escalate trade conflicts, the risk of a prolonged trade war remains high, with unpredictable consequences for global supply chains and financial markets.
Economic Justifications for Trump’s Tariffs
Despite widespread criticism, there are several economic arguments that Trump and his supporters use to justify imposing tariffs.
- Reducing the trade deficit: Trump views trade deficits as a loss for the U.S., believing that buying more from foreign countries than selling to them weakens the domestic economy.
- Second, protecting domestic industries is a traditional justification for tariffs. By making foreign goods more expensive, tariffs can encourage consumers to buy American-made products, potentially boosting domestic manufacturing and job creation.
- Third, strategic trade policy suggests that tariffs can be used to level the playing field against countries like China, which has been accused of unfair trade practices such as dumping, subsidies, and intellectual property theft.
- Finally, national security concerns are often cited, particularly regarding critical industries like semiconductors and steel, where the U.S. aims to reduce reliance on foreign supply chains and ensure domestic production capacity in times of crisis.
Economic Drawbacks of Trump’s Protectionist Tariffs
While Trump’s tariffs aim to protect American industries and reduce trade deficits, they come with significant economic downsides.
- First, higher consumer prices are a direct consequence of tariffs, as importers pass the additional costs onto businesses and households, reducing overall purchasing power.
- Second, retaliatory tariffs from trading partners can harm American exporters, making U.S. goods less competitive in global markets and potentially leading to job losses in affected industries.
- Third, disruptions to supply chains can increase production costs for American manufacturers who rely on imported components, forcing companies to either absorb the higher costs, relocate production overseas, or cut jobs.
- Finally, slower economic growth is a likely consequence of escalating tariffs, as reduced trade can lower efficiency, increase uncertainty for businesses, and deter foreign investment.
You might also like

All we are saying: give capitalism a chance
16th November 2014
Globalisation - Evaluating Benefits and Costs
Exam Support
Perfect Competition
Teaching PowerPoints

Options for Trade Deals if the UK Leaves the EU
24th April 2016

Martin Wolf on threats to globalisation
8th September 2016
Jim O'Neill defends Globalisation
19th January 2017

Global Financial Crisis - Ten Years On
6th August 2017
Economics of Rail Nationalisation
Study Notes