Explanations
Counter-intuitive effects of fuel subsidies in Madagascar
14th September 2019
The World Bank looks at how the Malagasy government has spent a significant amount subsidising fuel.
This excellent World Bank clip looks at the effects of this, and concludes that such an intervention is most beneficial for the rich who consume the most electricity - often from fuel-powered generators, the most fuel for transportation and processed food, another good that is energy-intensive.
As a result, the World Bank is seeking to reduce the government's involvement in the market for fuel and promote efficient market outcomes. A lovely example of why government intervention can have counter-intuitive effect.
You might also like
Scotland introduces a minimum charge for plastic bags
21st October 2014
Cigarettes, demerit goods and government failure
12th July 2013
Climate Change Policies - Finding the Right Mix
30th April 2012
Development Barriers - Corruption and Conflict
Study Notes
Market Failure & Government Intervention (Revision Presentation)
Teaching PowerPoints
Information Failure
Study Notes
Regulations (Government Intervention)
Study Notes
Fiscal Policy - Government Intervention
Study Notes