Case: Bourhill v Young (1943) | Topics | Law | tutor2u

Explore

GCSE

A-Level

BTEC, T-Level, IB, WJEC

More for students

Shop

Cinema revision workshops

Online courses

Revision livestreams

Examiner AI

Personal tuition
Subjects

Biology

Business

Criminology

Early Childhood Development

Economics

Geography

Health & Social Care

History

Law

Politics

Psychology

Sociology

Quick links

Shop

CPD courses & events

Find an interim teacher

Jobs board

Examiner AI

Student events & courses

Cinema revision workshops

Online student courses

Revision livestreams
Examiner AI
Shop

Sign in

Topics

Case: Bourhill v Young (1943)

No duty of care is owed in negligence iF the reasonable man would not foresee the risk of harm to the claimant.

Key Case | Bourhill v Young (1943) | Negligence - Duty of Care & Foreseeability

Study Notes