Round and Round in Circles

Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Print RSS Tweet This!

Exam Advice: If you want to gain good marks it’s a good idea to avoid giving circular answers to questions.  You know the sort of thing I mean.  It’s when the question says - ‘Describe what is meant by participant observation’ and the student writes ‘ It is when you participate and observe at the same time’.  Ha Ha. The word ‘describe’ means a bit more than throw back the question into the examiners face.  On a related theme, the standard joke of course, is this:  Oxford Philosophy Final Paper, Question 1. Is this a fair question?  Answer: ‘Yes, if this is a fair answer.’ Result: First Class Honours.  But, remember, that’s a joke, and it’s old, so if you try it, you will get a well-deserved fail.

Do some students really not see the problem with answers like this?  Or are they just embarrassed and desperately trying to fill the paper, or perhaps they think it is amusing?

I really don’t know, but I would just advise all students out there - avoid this like the plague.  Make sure you know and can define the basic concepts of your subject.  There are many complaints these days about standards, but one thing is constant; you still need to have some knowledge to pass an exam.

Rate this article:   

Print RSS Tweet This!


SOCIOLOGY TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER
Sign up for tutor2u's free Sociology Teacher Resource Newsletter.

*  Your Email Address:
*  Preferred Format:
*  Country:
    Full Name:
    Job / Position:
    School / College:
    Postcode:
    GCSE Sociology Board:
    AS/A2 Sociology Board:
*  Enter the security code shown:



Recent Threads on the Sociology Teacher Discussion Forums:
Posts in: General Sociology Teaching

Education Blockbusters



Comments

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Get a daily email update of new resources on the Sociology Teacher Blog

Sociology teacher discussion forum

Latest entries

Categories

Monthly Archives

Tags

crime, revision, educational attainment, class, employment, property, pay, unemployment, deviance, masculinity, mass media, expectations, usa, crime statistics, gender, fraud, social disorganisation, class and stratification, housing, equality, national curriculum, postmodernism, occupational crime, risk, working class, croydon study 1957, michael hough, quiz, research, gelsthorpe and louck, jensen, racism, control theory, schools reform, families and households, differential attainment, nyc crime, corporate crime, social bonds, runnymede trust, media, phillips and bowling, families, resources, culture, durkheim, bnp, shaw and mckay’s social disorganisation theory, policy studies institute, streaming, murder in nyc, social status, ethnicity, professional, folk devils, metropolitan police force, dark figure, offenders, david gillborn, social structure, white collar crime, hagan, inequality, moral panics, policing for london survey, banding, hernnstein, status, drugs, shaw and mckay, evaluation, trade, confidence, cecille wright, criminology, theft, power-control theory, poverty, research ethics, council estates, marion fitzgerald, teacher-pupil relations, uk crime, frances heidensohn, eysenck,
All tags

Syndicate