tutor2u Law Blog

Tracker Pixel for Entry

Supreme Court to rule on meaning of miscarriage of justice

Monday, May 09, 2011
Print Tweet This!Save to Favorites
Recommend on Google+

R (on the application of Adams) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice is a case in which the Supreme Court is set to rule on the meaning of miscarriage of justice. The primary appellant, Andrew Adams, spent 14 years in jail for a murder that he did not commit. The current position of the MoJ, according to lawyers for Barry George, another of the appellants, is that to be able to claim for a miscarriage of justice a claimant must be able to prove their innocence - not the easiest of propositions. The Court of Appeal (in the case of Andrew Adams v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 1291) refused Adams’ claim for compensation.

The case appears set to turn on the judges’ interpretation of the phrase “clearly innocent”. A brilliant case to use as an example of original precedent, statutory interpretation, and judicial review -as well as of an appeal from the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court on a point of law of “general public importance”. Guardian article is here.


blog comments powered by Disqus



LAW TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER
Sign up for the free Law Teacher Resource Newsletter from tutor2u

*  Your Email Address:
*  Preferred Format:
*  Country:
    Full Name:
    Job / Position:
    Postcode:
    School / College:
    Town / City:
    GCSE Law Board:
    AS/A2 Law Board:
*  Enter the security code shown: