Carbon Trading - News Update

Friday, May 09, 2008
by Geoff Riley

Here are three good articles on carbon trading for students wanting to be up to date and have some more arguments to hand:

BBC: “Carbon market’s value hits $64bn”

Nova Scotia News: “Canada may hook up with the EU carbon trading scheme”

Reuters: “British government shelves plans for personal carbon trading”

Jeffrey Sachs on Carbon Trading

Monday, May 05, 2008
by Geoff Riley

Jeffrey Sachs features on “You ask the Questions” in today’s Independent. There are loads of interesting questions and answers - Sachs remains positive about China’s growth potential although he expects it to decelerate to around seven per cent in the years ahead. Here he is on a question about carbon trading .... good evaluation here for students preparing for a question on carbon trading versus carbon taxes versus other policy measures:

“There is a good case for putting a price on carbon emissions but it is more straightforward to do it as a tax rather than a system of tradable permits. It would be easier to tax carbon at source – coal, oil, and gas companies. Tradable permits or carbon taxes will not help develop low-emission technologies. We need to combine carbon pricing with initiatives to promote sustainable energy and farming technologies.”

Catch the remainder of his article here

Carbon prices head higher as emissions targets start to bite

Thursday, April 03, 2008
by Geoff Riley

There was some important information this week from over 10,000 power generators, steel, cement and aluminum manufacturers.  The effectiveness of carbon trading in creating the right incentives for power users to cut emissions depends on there being a scarcity of carbon permits reflected in a price high enough (and sufficiently predictable in the medium term) for investment in improved fuel efficiency to be commercially viable. A couple of years ago the market price of carbon collapsed when it became clear that the EU had been overly generous in handing out free gifts of carbon permits. The criticisms were valid and the long term future of the carbon trading scheme was called into question.

But the signs for the second phase of this innovative market mechanism look more promising.

read more...»

The Big Question looks at carbon trading

Tuesday, March 11, 2008
by Geoff Riley

Plenty of environmental economics in today’s edition of the Independent. The regular Big Question feature looks at the costs and benefits of carbon trading in the wake of the government’s support for fresh investment in coal fired power stations. Read The Big Question: What is carbon trading, and will it help in the battle against climate change?

Their editorial lays into Chancellor Alastair Darling for being ready to sacrifice environmental targets because of a faltering economy.

“Environmental levies need two key features. The first is that they be substantial enough to change behaviour. The second, and no less important, is that the proceeds are seen to be channelled into green schemes, or to provide tax breaks for those who make more environmentally friendly choice.”

Read: Make the polluters pay, and give the others a break

Finally there is a feature on how the effects of climate change tend to hit disproportionately the poorest communities around the world - the costs of adapting to climate change are enormous and some regions and communities are least able to cope.

More environmental news and features in the Independent are available here

Page 1 of 1 pages

Latest entries

Categories

Monthly Archives

Tags

inflation, recession, confidence, housing, competition, prices, price, demand, dollar, slowdown, property, food, credit crunch, expectations, china, incentives, sterling, unemployment, profit, environment, consumption, euro, risk, supply, usa, trade, gdp, externalities, mortgage, emissions, costs, debt, investment, wealth, economist, globalisation, supermarkets, commodities, deflation, taxes, downturn, environmental, exports, inequality, productivity, welfare, retailers, economic cycle, employment, oil, saving, monopsony, macroeconomics, evaluation, behavioural economics, tim harford, pollution, airlines, interest rates, efficiency,

Syndicate