Broadband and economic development
Access to and the speed and reliability of broadband infrastructure is one of the key institutional factors that impact on economic development. The lack of an affordable and cost-effective broadband network can be a huge barrier to economic growth especially in an age where companies in many rich countries are looking to outsource their back office and call centre services to countries where operating costs are lowest. The 2009 UNCTAD Information Economy Report provides a wealth of background information on the global digital divide.
According to the latest report, businesses and consumers are 200 times more likely to have access to broadband in developed countries than in the poorest Least Developed Countries (LDCs). And the monthly cost of broadband access varies to an incredible degree - from over $1,300 a month in Burkina Faso, the Central African Republic to less than $13 in Egypt.
read more...»UK broadband in the slow lane
The relatively slow speed of the average broadband connections for most UK businesses and households will act as a contsraint on future competitiveness and growth. This report from BBC news finds that a study of the global state of broadband has put the UK 25th out of 66 countries in terms of the quality and reach of its networks. Rory Cellan Jones follows up the report with his own observations
“Britain has done well in the first broadband wave, using a pretty efficient copper network and DSL technology to get homes across most of the country connected. But other countries are moving forward more rapidly to build next generation networks using cable and fibre-optics.”
Investment in broadband can have significant demand and supply-side effects - the real consequences of under-investment will become more painful and obvious as time goes on - but who should pay for the extra capital spending needed? Will the new broadband tax make any noticeable difference?
Mobile Takeovers - Who will gain if five becomes four?
The press is full of coverage about a possible takeover bid by Vodafone for T-Mobile UK which is currently owned by Deutsche Telekom. Nothing is certain yet - but if a takeover goes ahead and is allowed by the competition authorities, Vodafone will have around 40 per cent of the market for mobile phone users in the UK.
The approximate market shares would look something like this:
Vodafone 40%
O2 (owned by Spain’s Telefónica) 27%
Orange (owned by France Telecom) 22%
3 (owned by Hutchison Whampoa) 8%
If Vodafone and T-Mobile become one business there is one obvious cost saving (or synergy) - namely that the merged business would have to run only one mobile network instead of two, for example, so Vodafone could aim to secure significant savings in capital and operating spending. For any would-be purchaser the risk is over-paying for a business, there are plenty of examples of the ‘winners’ curse’ in past takeover bids.
The mobile phone market is a classic case of an oligopoly with just a handful of corporations dominating the market - but you do not always need a large number of operators to create genuine price and non-price competition in the industry. Indeed the UK is the only major European market with five mobile operators, and some analysts claim that the fierce battle for market share has had the effect of cutting profit margins and reducing the profits needed to reinvest in rolling out the next generation of mobile phone technology and improving the speed and reliability of a mobile phone network that needs to cope with an ever-increasing number of data-rich applications.
Having four rather than five major players looks on the surface to be reducing competition, but perhaps all of the remaining businesses will gain from higher profits at a time when the recession has hit the demand for new handsets and mobile phone services. Vodafone is a giant in the industry reporting revenues of £41bn for the year to March 31, 2009 and an operating profit of £11.8bn.
In the mobile phone service provider market there is always a balance to be struck between economic efficiency and welfare. Competition keeps prices down for consumers and helps to make fast mobile connections more affordable to millions. But the businesses themselves must be able to finance investment on enormous networks and generate a sufficient rate of return for their shareholders. It will be interesting to see how the competition authorities respond to the next wave of consolidation in the industry.
Australia’s Broadband Superhighway
It is ambitious, expensive and will take years to roll out - but the Australian government’s newly announced $43 billion project to extend super-fast broadband across the country is the type of government funded infrastructure project that makes you sit up and take notice. This article in the Times could be a good one to use when teaching about the supply-side consequences of government spending. And it is another example of how fiscal policy can be used to kick start domestic demand with the creation of thousands of ‘shovel-ready’ jobs.
“The project, which will start in Tasmania next year, requires the installation of fibre cables across Australia - a vast undertaking that the Government said would create 25,000 jobs a year during the eight years of construction.”
Most Popular Topic Tags on the Economics Blog
recession, demand, economics, unemployment, prices, price, inflation, investment, costs, profit, trade, employment, debt, supply, downturn, euro, gdp, confidence, competition, risk, china, capacity, exports, production, incentives, oil, expectations, manufacturing, sterling, housing, pay, food, profits, banks, tutor2u, globalisation, mortgage, property, revision, retailers, slowdown, borrowing, usa, innovation, emissions, dollar, deflation, airlines, supermarkets, entrepreneur, monopsony, efficiency, productivity, google, elasticity, moodle, wealth, aqa, keynes, protectionism, welfare, consumption, externalities, saving, opec, economist, inequality, strategy, depression, competitiveness, economic cycle, tim harford, stocks, depreciation, jobs, monopoly, infrastructure, carbon, credit crunch, poverty, cars, bank of england, eu, vle, environmental, carbon trading, spare capacity, budget deficit, environment, subsidy, wages, market failure, management, regulation, evaluation, output gap, losses, behavioural, government failure, steel, climate change, construction, macroeconomics, imports, oligopoly, japan, bbc, skills, cpi, commodities, farming, newsnight, paul mason, intervention, fiscal stimulus, multiplier effect, single market, currencies, population, stagflation, itunes, contestable, lse, agflation, minimum wage, interest rates, choices, aviation, amazon, quantitative easing, germany, taxes, uk economy, monetary policy, cartel, survey, nationalisation, india, brazil, rpi, pricing, dan ariely, opportunity cost, apple, pollution, oecd, rationality, keynes society, rsa, relative poverty, shipping, iphone, capital, merger, currency, imf, balance of payments, yuan, tragedy of the commons, price discrimination, current account, economies of scale, redundancies, london, savings, facebook, stakeholders, shareholder, behavioural economics, mpc, supply chain, liquidity, takeover, barriers to entry, reputation, income elasticity, poverty trap, microsoft, human capital, hamish mcrae, subsidies, discrimination, roger bootle, federal reserve, robert peston, duopoly, immigration, suppliers, us economy, quiz, gini coefficient, collapse, coffee, obama, pensions, development, national debt, consumer surplus, crowding out, etonomics, eurozone, crude oil, scarcity, labour market, ecb, petrol, taxation, tesco, free, brand, smoking, budget, paradox of thrift, cost of living, transport, labour mobility, liquidity trap, global, speculation, starbucks, recovery, iceland, allocative efficiency, behaviour, surplus, david smith, waste, shareholders, ireland, happiness, growth, information failure, vat, creative destruction, open source, cost benefit analysis, trade deficit, tariffs, northern rock, edinburgh, comparative advantage, ownership, scrappage, robert frank, ocr economics, aggregate demand, freight, diane coyle, kaletsky, royal economic society, eton college, exploitation, labour force survey, government borrowing, utility, fishing, edexcel economics, sony, leverage, marginal cost, tax, paul krugman, information, discounting, animal spirits, peter day, contestable market, anchoring, nissan, zimbabwe, european union, savings ratio, wiki, needs, internet, public sector, evan davis, public goods, heathrow, price war, energy, hotels, standard of living, contestability, hbos, stephanie flanders, twitter, wants, migrants, poland, blog, consumer welfare, aqa economics, devaluation, spain, pubs, milk, foreign exchange, indirect tax, forecast, external shocks, eu enlargement, movies, advertising, enlargement, bond, mervyn king, income elasticity of demand, blogging, ebea, property rights, accelerator, edmund conway, deforestation, house prices, copper, hot money, jim o'neill, ucas, bonds, trend growth, libor, elasticity of supply, carbon tax, income, diesel, income tax, jobless, accelerator effect, law of unintended consequences, bric economies, guardian, youth unemployment, john kay, google wave, fixed costs, deficit, global economy, sub-prime, economic efficiency, exchange rates, vacancies, research, biofuel, renewable, companies, profit margin, price capping, joint venture, price mechanism, natural monopoly, world bank, martin wolf, training, startups, competition commission, gilts, geoff riley, immobility, coal, fairness, producer surplus, congestion, greece, redundancy, social costs, will king, sentiment, base rate, walmart, ageing population, disposable income, equity, corus, collusion, tickets, oil prices, fair trade, dynamic efficiency, obesity, social entrepreneur, russia, real income, res, binge drinking, philip allan, low pay, king of shaves, vehicles, broadband, cash, price fixing, tariff, hysteresis, tata, supply-side, government spending, eastern europe, internet explorer, income distribution, compound interest, contestable markets, positional goods, repossession, economax, general motors, sustainability, students, green shoots, ftse, age structure, frictional, satisficing, logic of life, pay floor, disincentives, yahoo, resources, gillette, liberalisation, blackberry, negative externalities, oft, aldi, migration, economics revision, financial times, fiscal drag, healthcare, asda, market structure, cadbury, credit, ryanair, wheat, market power, winners curse, apprenticeships, hidden unemployment, demography, cyclical, british airways, deindustrialisation, sovereign debt, credit cards, declan curry, nokia, renewable energy, optimal currency area, anti-trust, public good, decoupling, markets, diseconomies of scale, rory cellan-jones, the economist, barclays, economic welfare, tax burden, undercover economist, child poverty, retailing, pension, landfill, schumpeter, veblen goods, enterprise, brics, redistribution, floating exchange rate, gold, unintended consequences, vertical integration, structural, monetary policy committee, nhs, reserve currency, single currency, football, job losses, nairu, costa, nelson thornes, scotland, deleveraging, green revolution, drugs, collaboration, hyperinflation, automatic stabilisers, podcast, o2, motor industry, pay cuts, real gdp, monopoly power, global business, labour supply,All tags
ECONOMICS TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER
Join over 4,000 other Economics Teachers in the UK and around the world who receive the tutor2u Economics Resource Email newsletter. Get special offers, first news of latest resources, teaching ideas, conferences and workshops.
Recent Threads on the Economics Teacher Discussion Forums:
Posts in: General Economics Teaching
Need help. - Economic Growth
Economies of scale presentation A2
Economic development
International Competitiveness
Keynesian Aggregate Supply
Demand Supply (% VAT Imposed) How to...?
Policy conflict and the Euro
Registering for the tutor2u VLU
Video Case-study - lunchtime prices slashed
Long Exam Example to Use for Revision Please?
