Tobin or not Tobin?
Recommend on Google+
Given the huge volatility in the financial markets in the last 12 months, it is no surprise that the debate on Tobin taxes has been reignited.
In the 1970s, James Tobin, a Nobel-prize winning economist, first proposed introducing a tax on financial transactions to deter short-term currency speculation. The tax on currency trading would proposed to deter speculation in the wake of the collapse of the Bretton Woods system of pegging currencies. “This simple one-parameter tax would automatically penalise short-horizon round trips, while negligibly affecting commodity trade and long-term capital investments,” Tobin said, thus promoting greater economic stability.
More recently, in August of this year, arguing that such a tax might help to curb excessive pay, profit and activity in a “swollen” financial sector, Lord Turner, Chairman of the FSA, told Prospect magazine “If increased capital requirements are insufficient, I am happy to consider taxes on financial transactions—Tobin taxes,”.
Lord Turner asserts that the UK financial sector has grown too big; that some financial sector activity is worthless from a social perspective; that the sector is destabilising the British economy; and that new taxes may be required to curb excessive profits and pay in the sector.
On the other hand, Economics teaches us that taxes and other public interventions to correct distortions and other market failures should be targeted directly at the distortion or failure in question. It is not clear exactly what distortion a tax on financial transactions is targeting. Willem Buiter, writing in the Financial Times, agrees with Lord Turner that the UK financial sector – too large to fail and possibly also too large to save – has become a destabilising force for the UK, he strongly disagrees with the Tobin tax as a solution and discusses how other solutions instead could be more effective.
There are also issues of whether in such a globalised world of finance, with footloose capital, such a tax would simply threaten London’s future as a global business center.
Opponents argue it would drive financial business offshore, or that it would not prevent currencies from being overvalued, or being at the mercy of speculators.
And whilst Tobin never intended this as its original purpose, Turner also added that “Such taxes have long been the dream of development economists and those who care about climate change—a nice sensible revenue source for funding global public goods.” Around $912 trillion is traded annually on the world’s foreign exchanges and skimming a tiny proportion of that revenue into a fund to fight global poverty has long been a dream of campaigners. More recently, development campaigners have suggested a tax levied at .005% would raise between $30bn and $60bn a year – enough for the G7 countries to meet their commitment to double global aid. Indeed, a firm called Ethical Currency has already started to run with the idea.
In reality, Tobin taxes are unlikely to become a feature of the financial landscape (particularly given the global cooperation required to make them work), but Turner’s message is clear: these are uncertain and unprecedented times, and may call for unprecedented solutions.
blog comments powered by Disqus
ECONOMICS TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER
Join over 6,000 other Economics Teachers in the UK and around the world who receive the tutor2u regular Economics Resource Email Newsletter. Get special offers, first news of latest resources, teaching ideas, conferences and workshops + loads of great ideas for teaching economics from our blog authors.





