Q&A: Is capital investment always more profitable in inflationary times?
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Print
Email
Save this entry to my Favorites
Is capital investment are always more profitable in inflationary times?
One way of measuring the profitability of an investment project is as a rate of return on capital employed. The real return makes an adjustment for the effects of inflation and it is the expected real return that should drive investment decisions.
‘Inflationary times’ suggests a period when there is a sustained rise in the general level of prices in an economy and perhaps too an acceleration in inflation. If prices of goods and services are increasing year on year and given that capital investment will produce a flow of output over a number of years – does this make investment more profitable and attractive?
The answer is probably not – much depends of course on the rate of inflation but there are good grounds for arguing that higher inflation damages the profitability of investment:
1. Higher inflation might be due to increasing costs of materials, components and other inputs used in supplying products to the market – increased costs damage profit margins
2. Inflationary times will also create pressure for higher wages which, in the absence of offsetting productivity improvements, will cause a rise in unit labour costs
3. Businesses face greater uncertainty at times of inflation – they cannot be sure what is likely to happen to their own costs and also to key macroeconomic indicators such as interest rates and the exchange rate. Businesses are likely to face higher borrowing costs for their loans and overdrafts and higher yields on corporate bonds – all of which will have a negative impact on profitability
4. Higher inflation can cut into the real incomes of consumers leading to a slower growth of demand for goods and services. This risks leaving a business that has invested heavily in new capital equipment with a lot of under-utilised capacity.
5. High relative inflation rates compared to other countries will lead to deterioration in international competitiveness and perhaps a loss of sales in key export markets.
In short rising prices and revenues because of inflation can give rise to an inflation illusion. Businesses might look like they are reaping the benefits of a rise in the general price level, but profitability is essentially down to the costs of production. A low and fairly stable positive rate of inflation can be good news for investment.
High and volatile inflation can be very damaging to the real rate of return on capital investments – this is one of the key lessons from the inflationary decades of the 1970s and 1980s. Equally sustained price deflation can cause difficulties too.
Print
Email
ECONOMICS TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER
Join over 4,000 other Economics Teachers in the UK and around the world who receive the tutor2u Economics Resource Email newsletter. Get special offers, first news of latest resources, teaching ideas, conferences and workshops.
Recent Threads on the Economics Teacher Discussion Forums:
Posts in:
General Economics Teaching
Need help. - Economic Growth
Economies of scale presentation A2
Economic development
International Competitiveness
Keynesian Aggregate Supply
Demand Supply (% VAT Imposed) How to...?
Policy conflict and the Euro
Registering for the tutor2u VLU
Video Case-study - lunchtime prices slashed
Long Exam Example to Use for Revision Please?
Comments
Most Popular Topic Tags on the Economics Blog
recession,
demand,
unemployment,
economics,
prices,
price,
inflation,
investment,
costs,
profit,
trade,
employment,
debt,
supply,
downturn,
confidence,
euro,
gdp,
competition,
risk,
capacity,
china,
production,
incentives,
exports,
oil,
expectations,
manufacturing,
sterling,
housing,
pay,
food,
profits,
banks,
tutor2u,
globalisation,
mortgage,
property,
revision,
retailers,
slowdown,
borrowing,
usa,
innovation,
emissions,
dollar,
deflation,
airlines,
supermarkets,
entrepreneur,
monopsony,
efficiency,
productivity,
google,
elasticity,
moodle,
wealth,
aqa,
keynes,
welfare,
consumption,
externalities,
saving,
opec,
economist,
inequality,
strategy,
depression,
economic cycle,
protectionism,
tim harford,
stocks,
competitiveness,
jobs,
monopoly,
carbon,
depreciation,
credit crunch,
poverty,
infrastructure,
cars,
bank of england,
vle,
environmental,
carbon trading,
spare capacity,
budget deficit,
environment,
eu,
subsidy,
market failure,
wages,
regulation,
management,
evaluation,
losses,
behavioural,
steel,
government failure,
output gap,
climate change,
construction,
macroeconomics,
imports,
oligopoly,
japan,
bbc,
skills,
cpi,
commodities,
farming,
newsnight,
paul mason,
intervention,
fiscal stimulus,
currencies,
population,
stagflation,
contestable,
itunes,
lse,
agflation,
minimum wage,
interest rates,
choices,
aviation,
amazon,
single market,
germany,
taxes,
uk economy,
monetary policy,
cartel,
survey,
nationalisation,
multiplier effect,
quantitative easing,
brazil,
rpi,
pricing,
dan ariely,
opportunity cost,
apple,
pollution,
oecd,
rationality,
keynes society,
india,
rsa,
relative poverty,
iphone,
shipping,
capital,
merger,
currency,
imf,
balance of payments,
tragedy of the commons,
price discrimination,
current account,
redundancies,
economies of scale,
london,
facebook,
savings,
stakeholders,
shareholder,
behavioural economics,
mpc,
supply chain,
liquidity,
takeover,
barriers to entry,
reputation,
income elasticity,
poverty trap,
microsoft,
hamish mcrae,
human capital,
subsidies,
discrimination,
roger bootle,
yuan,
duopoly,
robert peston,
immigration,
suppliers,
us economy,
gini coefficient,
quiz,
collapse,
obama,
pensions,
coffee,
development,
consumer surplus,
national debt,
crowding out,
etonomics,
eurozone,
crude oil,
scarcity,
labour market,
ecb,
petrol,
taxation,
brand,
tesco,
free,
budget,
paradox of thrift,
smoking,
cost of living,
transport,
labour mobility,
global,
speculation,
starbucks,
recovery,
iceland,
allocative efficiency,
behaviour,
david smith,
surplus,
federal reserve,
waste,
shareholders,
ireland,
growth,
information failure,
happiness,
creative destruction,
open source,
vat,
cost benefit analysis,
trade deficit,
tariffs,
northern rock,
edinburgh,
ownership,
scrappage,
ocr economics,
robert frank,
aggregate demand,
diane coyle,
freight,
kaletsky,
royal economic society,
eton college,
All tags