Price gouging in Edinburgh

It is not gouging , it is price discrimination.

they are targeting different groups of dinner at the different times.

It is the same as airlines selling seats at different prices.

Since the restaurant appears to be closed for half an hour 4:30- 5:00, it seems perfectly possible that the dinner buffet is entirely differently composed than the lunch buffet. Perhaps there are more expensive ingredients, more choices or even more courses which might justify the differential in price by reason of higher costs. In that, albeit unlikely, scenario this would be a case of price differentiation rather than price discrimination or “gouging?”

I’ll check the lunch and supper menus to see for any differences!

I’ve already explained my stance on price discrimination in the Madonna article so it’s unsurprising that I find it heartening a restaurant would have an insertable price sign, it suggests that the managers have some sense of economics and understand the importance of using customer flow statistics to find the market equilibrium price. A sign like that means that they’re flexible to change, are willing to experiment with various pricing policies and also reduces menu costs. I actually ate there Thursday lunchtime and the food wasn’t too bad, large range but a bit greasy.

Most of the price differences can be explained through supply and demand. More people coming in during weekends hence higher prices etc. I was surprised by the Sunday dinner being cheaper too, at first I thought it might have something to do with church or family time...? Having been to many Chinese buffets, I can predict that the lunch menu and the dinner menu don’t vary all that much - or at least not enough to justify a £5 increase. I put this down to interdependence upon other competitors. Everyone else charges more for dinner, so there is not really an incentive to cut prices too much - it’s not collusion but it’s something close to it. The price inertia makes me think that kinked demand curve theory may even apply here, demonstrating certain oligopolistic characteristics.

I’m hugely fascinated by buffets (in both senses) since it’s an *alternate* way of price structuring. I’m often surprised that they can keep in business considering the self-selection bias that exists for them. In America, many “buffets” actually ask you to pay by the weight rather than an all-you-can-eat at un prix fixe, may be the only way they can keep themselves in business. But I saw that Jimmy Chung actually has a chain of buffet restaurants all around Scotland so his corporate strategy of price discrimination must be working so far!

The all-day breakfast is served from 8-30am t 11.30am - but only in the central Edinburgh location

Another interesting snippet - Jimmy Chung does indeed run restaurants in different parts of Scotland (and also in Dublin) and they charge different prices in their restaurants as this evidence illustrates: Cheaper in Aberdeen and also away from the tourist trapof Wavereley Street!

Edinburgh - Grindlay Street
Lunch
Monday - Thursday: £5.49 per person
Friday: £6.49 per person

Dinner
Monday - Thursday: £10.99 per person
Friday - Saturday: £11.99 per person

Sunday: £8.99 per person

Edinburgh Waverley

Lunch: Monday - Thursday
£5.99 per person
Friday - Sunday
£6.99 per person

Dinner

Sunday:£9.99 per person
Monday – Thursday: £10.99 per person
Friday - Saturday: £11.99 per person

Aberdeen

Lunch
Monday - Thursday: £4.99 per person
Friday - Sunday: £5.99 per person

Dinner
Monday - Thursday: £9.90 per person
Friday - Sunday:£11.90 per person

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:

Most Popular Topic Tags on the Economics Blog

recession, demand, economics, price, unemployment, prices, inflation, investment, costs, profit, downturn, supply, trade, debt, employment, confidence, euro, gdp, competition, capacity, risk, production, china, oil, incentives, exports, expectations, housing, pay, manufacturing, sterling, food, profits, property, mortgage, tutor2u, globalisation, banks, revision, slowdown, borrowing, usa, retailers, emissions, deflation, airlines, innovation, dollar, supermarkets, entrepreneur, efficiency, monopsony, elasticity, aqa, welfare, consumption, economist, productivity, saving, google, keynes, wealth, opec, depression, moodle, depreciation, jobs, competitiveness, credit crunch, economic cycle, cars, externalities, stocks, infrastructure, environmental, strategy, tim harford, carbon, vle, monopoly, subsidy, evaluation, eu, management, losses, protectionism, inequality, spare capacity, environment, poverty, bank of england, budget deficit, construction, behavioural, wages, macroeconomics, carbon trading, steel, commodities, output gap, skills, japan, oligopoly, imports, currencies, bbc, stagflation, contestable, agflation, cpi, farming, newsnight, choices, regulation, survey, taxes, government failure, itunes, minimum wage, lse, climate change, paul mason, population, intervention, keynes society, aviation, amazon, fiscal stimulus, single market, pricing, dan ariely, cartel, nationalisation, pollution, eton college, interest rates, shareholder, london, rationality, redundancies, market failure, rpi, mpc, shipping, behavioural economics, germany, robert peston, india, rsa, reputation, currency, quantitative easing, facebook, income elasticity, current account, stakeholders, brazil, coffee, savings, microsoft, monetary policy, crowding out, barriers to entry, collapse, multiplier effect, suppliers, economies of scale, price discrimination, uk economy, development, quiz, apple, surplus, taxation, labour market, tesco, free, scrappage, behaviour, tragedy of the commons, opportunity cost, open source, vat, smoking, cost of living, poverty trap, merger, growth, speculation, edinburgh, discrimination, ownership, cost benefit analysis, northern rock, global, ireland, supply chain, oecd, shareholders, scarcity, balance of payments, petrol, liquidity, duopoly, etonomics, iphone, trade deficit, starbucks, happiness, budget, human capital, subsidies, capital, immigration, eurozone, takeover, ecb, paradox of thrift, exploitation, advertising, wiki, public sector, utility, wants, labour force survey, peter day, tax, brand, blog, poland, iceland, foreign exchange, recovery, indirect tax, european union, robert frank, roger bootle, ocr economics, heathrow, hbos, hotels, freight, creative destruction, federal reserve, kaletsky, price war, information failure, spain, crude oil,
All tags