Paul Ormerod: The psychology of mergers and acquisitions
International Airlines Group (IAG), formed in January 2011 by a merger of British Airways and Iberia, is in the news. Operating losses at Iberia in the first nine months of the financial year are believed to be in excess of £200 million.
Since the start of last year, IAG’s shares are down by nearly 40 per cent. Shareholders have a right to feel disgruntled. They might, for example, reasonably raise queries about the revenue forecasting methodology of IAG, just how far out were the projections? Or they may ask how much ‘revenue synergy’ – his task specified on the IAG website – has actually been achieved by Robert Boyle, the Director of Strategy. The list can go on.
Such details of the problems are specific to the BA/Iberia merger. But the principles are general across a whole range of merger and acquisition activity amongst publicly listed companies. Twenty years ago, three American business school academics carried out a studied which transformed the approach to analysing mergers and acquisitions. There was a lot of work about the impact on share prices of an announcement of a merger, and on the value to the shareholders of the company being acquired. Julian Franks, Robert Harris and Sheridan Titman looked instead at the long-run impact on the share price of the company in the driving seat.
What they found was not good news.Their results gave rise to a whole new area of academic activity, the so-called ‘post-merger performance puzzle’. Most of the time, the shareholders of the acquiring company lose out. Each individual case has its own particular reasons, but initiating a merger or acquisition is usually bad news for your shareholders.
For believers in economic rationality and efficient markets, this is a puzzle of the first magnitude. On this view of the world, people are allowed to make mistakes. But they are not permitted to do so consistently. For every merger which underperforms, there should be one which delivers unexpectedly large benefits to the shareholders. And there have been such a large number of mergers and acquisitions that executives ought to be able to learn from previous mistakes. Instead, we observe that there is a persistent downside for shareholders of the acquiring company. Occasionally they gain, usually they lose.
IAG is just one more example of this phenomenon. It is one more nail in the coffin of the concept of economic rationality. To understand why very experienced managers still pursue mergers and acquisitions, despite the track record of such activity, we need to turn less to economics and more to psychology.
George Soros in a speech in June this year borrowed a phrase from University College London psychoanalyst David Tuckett, when he described the boom phase in the EU as being a ‘fantastic object’, unreal but immensely attractive. Executives may create such objects when they think of mergers and acquisitions. BA remains a vital part of the British economy. Let’s hope that Willie Walsh brings IAG back to Earth and sorts out the mess.
Paul Ormerod is an economist at Volterra Partners LLP, a director of the think-tank Synthesis and author of Positive Linking: How Networks Can Revolutionise the World
blog comments powered by Disqus
Paul Ormerod: Ignore Krugman: We’re not caught in another depression [12 Jun 2013]
Paul Ormerod: The Rapid Rise of the Food Bank [12 Jun 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Trouble at the Co-op Bank [12 Jun 2013]
Unit 3 Micro: Business Economics Key Term Glossary [2 Jun 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Do the proper sums, HS2 is worth it [24 May 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Scotland could be a scientific test bed for monetary theory [17 May 2013]
Unit 3 Micro: Businesses Prospering During the Depression [13 May 2013]
Paul Ormerod: The Reinhardt and Rogoff miscalculation [25 Apr 2013]
Unit 3 Micro: Mergers and Acquisitions Update [19 Apr 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Whatever happened to all those miners? Shocks and economic resilience [18 Apr 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Sovereign debt and Euro zone reality [11 Apr 2013]
Paul Ormerod: The Market for Speeding Points [29 Mar 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Hip Hop and Why Some Things Succeed [15 Mar 2013]
Paul Ormerod: How expert are experts? Time to end the independence of the Bank [7 Mar 2013]
Paul Ormerod: What would Keynes have said? Ouija board active! [1 Mar 2013]
Peter Mandelson famously said that he was ‘intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich’. As [15 Feb 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Springtime for America [1 Feb 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Tax cuts, public spending and morality [25 Jan 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Telling the Truth about the Retirement Age [18 Jan 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Meat and potato pies and the Nobel Prize in economics [10 Jan 2013]
Paul Ormerod: Bankers, Greens and the Barking Mad: When Prophesy Fails [13 Dec 2012]
Paul Ormerod: Prisons, incentives and how to save the planet [30 Nov 2012]
Paul Ormerod: A stitch in time: We need smarter government, but less of it [22 Nov 2012]
Paul Ormerod: Our Friends in the North are trapped in a monetary union [8 Nov 2012]
Paul Ormerod: Corporation tax: fostering the illusions of the electorate that someone else will pay [31 Oct 2012]
Unit 3 Micro: Nike Kicks Umbro into Row Z [26 Oct 2012]
Paul Ormerod: If it can happen to Google, who can feel safe? [24 Oct 2012]
Paul Ormerod: Don’t say IMF, it’s IMF Squared! [18 Oct 2012]
Paul Ormerod: Policy makers have learned from the mistakes of the 1930s [11 Oct 2012]
Paul Ormerod: Ninja Turtles, Nick Clegg and Market Failure [4 Oct 2012]
Paul Ormerod: Is this a pleb I see before me? Reality and perception in the markets [27 Sep 2012]
Paul Ormerod: Lessonsin Economics from the Nobel Laureates [26 Sep 2012]
Teaching Economics After the Crisis [23 Sep 2012]
Paul Ormerod: We are all better off than we think [20 Sep 2012]
Paul Ormerod: A Tale of Two Recessions: Grounds for Optimism [13 Sep 2012]
Paul Ormerod: How Big is My Multiplier? [6 Sep 2012]
Beer Glass Shape Reduces Drinking [5 Sep 2012]
Paul Ormerod on Positive Linking [4 Sep 2012]
Why teachers are just like bankers [30 Aug 2012]
Measuring GDP is as much an art as a science [28 Aug 2012]
The Olympics and the wider struggle [28 Aug 2012]
The Olympics, traffic in Central London and a bar in Santa Fe [28 Aug 2012]
The Power of Networks [31 May 2012]
End Depression Now! Paul Krugman at the LSE [30 May 2012]
Oxbridge Economics: Introduction to Game Theory [21 May 2012]
Unit 3 Micro: Game Theory and Business Economics [21 May 2012]
Unit 3 Micro: Revision on Takeovers and Mergers [3 Apr 2012]
Price of Stamp increases to 60p [27 Mar 2012]
Unit 2 Macro: Focus on UK Manufacturing [6 Mar 2012]
Adapt or Die - Lord Bilimoria and the Cobra Story [4 Mar 2012]
Unit 3 Micro: Volkswagen targets growth markets [25 Feb 2012]
Unit 3 Economics: Cooperation and Competition [17 Feb 2012]
Economics Resources - Week Ended 6 November 2011 [6 Nov 2011]
Unit 3 Micro: Tesco Behaving Badly - Price Anchoring [17 Oct 2011]
Skidelsky in Madrid [12 Oct 2011]
Unit 3 Micro: Contestable Markets - Lucozade takes on Coca Cola [10 Oct 2011]
Unit 3 Micro: Oligopsony - Dairy Losses Drive Farmers from the Fields [10 Jul 2011]
A2 Micro: Competition Policy [20 May 2011]
A2 Micro: Price Discrimination [19 May 2011]
A2 Micro: Examples of Price Discrimination [19 May 2011]
A2 Micro: Outsourcing [18 May 2011]
A2 Micro: Moving Away from Profit Max [18 May 2011]
Review of “Adapt” by Tim Harford [9 May 2011]
Dominos Pizza turns to Behavioural Economics [5 May 2011]
Management lessons from the War in Iraq [30 Apr 2011]
Economics Recommended Reading - Summer 2011 [26 Apr 2011]
Shared Value and the Limitations of CSR [12 Feb 2011]
Shorting the market - the vultures target HMV [23 Jan 2011]
Tesco - Time to start a price war! [19 Jan 2011]
Economics Q&A: Tragedy of the Commons and Market Failure [18 Jan 2011]
Behavioural Economics - Nudge Squared! [30 Dec 2010]
Behavioural Economics - Public Policy and Behavioural Change [30 Dec 2010]
Growth and Strategy at Domino’s Pizza [27 Nov 2010]
Steven Johnson – Where Good Ideas Come From [2 Nov 2010]
Paul Ormerod on the Power of Networks [26 Oct 2010]
Departing from pure profit maximisation [14 Oct 2010]
CEO admits biggest mistake in corporate history! [29 Sep 2010]
IMF signs off on UK’s fiscal plans [27 Sep 2010]
Paul Ormerod on Behavioural Nudges and Networks [5 Sep 2010]
Essential business reading for the summer! [5 Aug 2010]
Euro Land and Optimal Currency Areas - A Valentine’s Day Massacre [29 May 2010]
Fosters Demerger - Beer and Wine rarely mix! [26 May 2010]
UK CEOs on their recession strategies [23 Feb 2010]
Warner on merger motivations and shareholder value [24 Jan 2010]
Law and Morality in Economic Life [26 Nov 2009]
Score Draw and Soccernomics [11 Oct 2009]
Managing a global business in turbulent times [23 Sep 2009]
Simon Henry at the Keynes Society [20 Sep 2009]
Hold the phone! [9 Sep 2009]
Jury’s Inn - An Example of Organic Growth [26 Jul 2009]
Taking the pulse around the UK economy - are the anti-virals working? [15 Jul 2009]
King of Shaves takes on Wilkinette [21 Jun 2009]
Revision: Moving Away from Profit Maximisation [10 May 2009]
Friends Reunited and the Winners Curse [21 Feb 2009]
Negative mulitplier effects of a brutal outlook for carmakers [17 Jan 2009]
Animal spirits and the depth of a recession [10 Dec 2008]
Budgeting for expansion [27 Oct 2008]
The Great Unravelling [10 Oct 2008]
Dynamic pricing in car parks [10 Jun 2008]
Pricing the new iPhone [2 Jun 2008]
AS & A2 Economics Revision / Exam Coaching Workshops Coming Up:
Monday 11 March 2013 - Portsmouth (Vue, Gunwharf Quays)
Wednesday 13 March 2013 - Fulham (Vue, Fulham Broadway)
Thursday 14 March 2013 - Stratford City (Vue, Westfield)
Friday 15 March 2013 - Bristol (Vue, Cribbs Causeway)
Monday 18 March 2013 - Birmingham (Vue, Star City)
Tuesday 19 March 2013 - Manchester (Vue, Salford Quays)
Thursday 21 March 2013 - Newcastle (Odeon, Metro Centre)
Friday 22 March 2013 - Leeds (Vue, The Light)
Monday 22 April 2013 - Stratford City (Vue, Westfield)
Join over 10,000 Economics teachers who receive our regular Economics Teacher Resource Newsletter:
