Law and Morality in Economic Life
Recommend on Google+
It is easier to destroy a society than it is to build it. And tipping points that cause people en mass to lose faith and confidence in institutions are more likely than we might assume. This was one of the themes from an outstanding lecture given at the Royal Institution yesterday by Sir Partha Dasgupta as this year’s Royal Economic Society annual public lecture. Drawing on a lifetime of experiences and research, Sir Partha enthralled his audience with a brilliantly structured talk on the growing importance of social norms in helping us to understand more clearly the gulf in economic wealth and life chances between different parts of the world.
Why some countries are rich and others remain poor is a question that has tested economists for well over two hundred years. Many growth theories have been developed and the emphasis has shifted from the importance of physical (fixed) capital to the importance of human capital (education, skills and health outcomes), and more recently to the economic and social returns from investment in the production of knowledge especially in science and technology.
But the most recent developments in growth theory have a different focus, namely the impact that social capital can have and in particular, the ways in which trust can be created among people and how best to generate confidence in institutions and rules. The banking crisis remains fresh in our memories and we remember too instances of social breakdown (for example the LA riots) which few people predicted.
Trust is a vital component in so many aspects of our daily lives - our willingness to trust each other and collaborate lies at the heart of a vast number of economic transactions from creating a new business, to offering insurance, entering into marriage or engaging in collaborative teaching. How best to sustain trust was a theme at the heart of Professor Dasgupta’s lecture. He identified five strategies:
1/ Mutual affection (the implicit understand that comes from loving relationships)
2/ Pro-social disposition (I might feel bad about letting someone else down, our incentives to be honest)
3/ Mutual reinforcement (e.g. punishments for broken promises, withholding future cooperation)
4/ Reputation (reputations can be built or undermined when transactions are repeated on many occasions, brand values)
5/ External enforcement (an impersonal approach to changing behaviour, verification, witness statements, the rule of law, legal institutions and enquiries)
Professor Dasgupta focused on mutual reinforcement and took his audience into the realms of game theory using the classic Prisoners’ Dilemma game as the basis for exploring the risks of defection in relationships becoming a social norm. He chose a behavioural strategy in the game known as GRIM - namely that players start by co-operating and continue to do so as long as no one has broken the co-operative trust established at the start. However, once one player has defected, under GRIM the other player chooses to defect forever with no forgiveness. Under this most punishing of strategies (a long way removed from tit for tat) he showed that if the prospect of meeting again and repeating game is pretty high (less than 50%) then GRIM can become a social norm (an equilibrium strategy) even though the mutual benefits of co-operation are strong in the classic PD game matrix. Indeed he argued that social co-operation is not inevitable even if conditions are assumed to be favourable.
We find that trust can be reinforcing and have huge economic and social benefits - especially when trust extends far beyond the boundaries of localised economic relationships and transactions. From climate change negotiations through to trade discussions, and from the consequences of a breakdown of trust for the cost of our insurance premiums or the chance of a business start up getting a loan, trust is a component of social capital we are beginning to understand more. But economists have had little to say about this in the past, perhaps this is an age when economists can realise mutual gains from trade in ideas with psychologists and biologists in reforming policies and institutions to promote co-operation, trust and a stronger sense of mutuality in economic life?
blog comments powered by Disqus
ECONOMICS TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER
Join over 6,000 other Economics Teachers in the UK and around the world who receive the tutor2u regular Economics Resource Email Newsletter. Get special offers, first news of latest resources, teaching ideas, conferences and workshops + loads of great ideas for teaching economics from our blog authors.


