Judging the impact of QE
Thursday, November 05, 2009
Print
Email
Save this entry to my Favorites
The BBC carries this interesting video discussion with De Anne Julius about the impact of the Bank’s Quantitative Easing programme designed to support demand and lending in the UK economy. She emphasises the importance of gradually withdrawing the QE programme and she argues that the main effect of QE so far has been to hold down the interest rate on government debt (gilts) but that there is little evidence so far that QE has enabled a rise in lending to consumers and small businesses. The Indy’s Big Question looks at QE in their edition today.
Some economists favour a change in the direction of QE away from simple purchases of government debt (the BoE effectively becomes to purchase of first resort for the Debt Issue Office) towards purchases of private sector assets such as shares or bonds issued by companies. The Bank of England is now estimated to hold around a fifth of the total stock of government bonds (gilts).
I really like Roger Bootle’s article in the Telegraph
“QE’s ghastly name makes it seem completely novel and even outlandish. In reality, though, it is no more than the policy of “open market operations” described in the classic textbook on money and banking by Richard Sayers and advocated by John Maynard Keynes in the 1930s, learned by two generations of students of monetary economics but hardly ever implemented until recently. In the vernacular, it is known by the much more catchy title of “printing money”, though hardly any extra notes have been printed.”
“In the end, the way out of our current dire predicament will depend hugely upon what happens to the world economy, over which we have no control and precious little influence. We have done all we can to help our export response to whatever transpires by allowing and encouraging the pound to fall.”
More here
And David Smith wrote about QE in his Sunday Times piece last weekend
November news update:
“The Bank of England voted to boost its quantitative easing (QE) programme, which is aimed at increasing the money supply and helping the economy, bringing planned spending to a total of £200bn. At the end of a two-day meeting, the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) also chose to keep interest rates at their record low of 0.5 per cent. “
Print
Email
ECONOMICS TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER
Join over 4,000 other Economics Teachers in the UK and around the world who receive the tutor2u Economics Resource Email newsletter. Get special offers, first news of latest resources, teaching ideas, conferences and workshops.
Recent Threads on the Economics Teacher Discussion Forums:
Posts in:
General Economics Teaching
Video Case-study - lunchtime prices slashed
Long Exam Example to Use for Revision Please?
Good hotel in London for school trip
Competitive Markets
Diminishing Returns
Complementary goods - HELP Please!
URgent Help Needed
Equilibrium concept
The price of life
Extended Project Qualification
Comments
Most Popular Topic Tags on the Economics Blog
recession,
demand,
economics,
price,
unemployment,
prices,
inflation,
investment,
costs,
profit,
downturn,
supply,
trade,
debt,
employment,
confidence,
euro,
gdp,
competition,
capacity,
risk,
production,
china,
oil,
incentives,
exports,
expectations,
housing,
pay,
manufacturing,
sterling,
food,
profits,
property,
mortgage,
tutor2u,
globalisation,
banks,
revision,
slowdown,
borrowing,
usa,
retailers,
emissions,
deflation,
airlines,
innovation,
dollar,
supermarkets,
entrepreneur,
efficiency,
monopsony,
elasticity,
aqa,
welfare,
consumption,
economist,
productivity,
saving,
google,
keynes,
opec,
wealth,
depression,
moodle,
depreciation,
jobs,
credit crunch,
competitiveness,
economic cycle,
cars,
externalities,
stocks,
infrastructure,
environmental,
strategy,
tim harford,
carbon,
vle,
monopoly,
subsidy,
evaluation,
management,
eu,
losses,
protectionism,
spare capacity,
inequality,
environment,
poverty,
bank of england,
budget deficit,
construction,
behavioural,
wages,
macroeconomics,
carbon trading,
steel,
commodities,
output gap,
skills,
japan,
oligopoly,
currencies,
imports,
bbc,
stagflation,
contestable,
cpi,
agflation,
farming,
newsnight,
choices,
regulation,
survey,
taxes,
government failure,
itunes,
minimum wage,
lse,
climate change,
paul mason,
population,
intervention,
aviation,
keynes society,
amazon,
fiscal stimulus,
single market,
pricing,
dan ariely,
nationalisation,
cartel,
pollution,
eton college,
interest rates,
shareholder,
london,
rationality,
redundancies,
market failure,
rpi,
mpc,
shipping,
behavioural economics,
germany,
robert peston,
india,
rsa,
reputation,
quantitative easing,
currency,
facebook,
income elasticity,
stakeholders,
current account,
brazil,
coffee,
savings,
microsoft,
crowding out,
monetary policy,
barriers to entry,
collapse,
multiplier effect,
suppliers,
economies of scale,
price discrimination,
development,
uk economy,
quiz,
apple,
surplus,
taxation,
tesco,
free,
scrappage,
labour market,
behaviour,
opportunity cost,
tragedy of the commons,
open source,
vat,
smoking,
cost of living,
poverty trap,
growth,
merger,
speculation,
edinburgh,
ownership,
discrimination,
northern rock,
global,
cost benefit analysis,
ireland,
oecd,
supply chain,
shareholders,
scarcity,
balance of payments,
petrol,
liquidity,
duopoly,
etonomics,
iphone,
starbucks,
trade deficit,
happiness,
budget,
human capital,
capital,
subsidies,
immigration,
eurozone,
takeover,
ecb,
paradox of thrift,
exploitation,
wiki,
advertising,
public sector,
peter day,
utility,
wants,
labour force survey,
brand,
tax,
iceland,
blog,
poland,
recovery,
foreign exchange,
indirect tax,
european union,
roger bootle,
ocr economics,
robert frank,
heathrow,
hbos,
hotels,
freight,
creative destruction,
federal reserve,
kaletsky,
price war,
information failure,
crude oil,
spain,
All tags