How a television monopoly ended in mediocrity
Recommend on Google+
The standard neo-classical theory presents a monopoly as a “bad” entity that will lead to inefficiency in the form of higher prices, lower consumer surplus, abuse of market dominance, x-inefficiency, etc etc…
Then there is the counter-argument which posits ideas such as monopolies are “good” as they allow higher supernormal profits, which can be used for R&D to create more innovative products, which are of a higher quality etc.
Here is an interesting article in the Financial Times by John Kay that looks at the issue of monopoly from a novel perspective, applied to the television industry through the example of the book industry; and looks at the issue of allowing more competition. More competition and choice may not always be better for the consumer, since with more competition comes a desire to chase market share at the expense of quality.
blog comments powered by Disqus
ECONOMICS TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER
Join over 6,000 other Economics Teachers in the UK and around the world who receive the tutor2u regular Economics Resource Email Newsletter. Get special offers, first news of latest resources, teaching ideas, conferences and workshops + loads of great ideas for teaching economics from our blog authors.


