How a television monopoly ended in mediocrity

Thursday, June 25, 2009
Print RSS Tweet This! Save this entry to my Favorites

The standard neo-classical theory presents a monopoly as a “bad” entity that will lead to inefficiency in the form of higher prices, lower consumer surplus, abuse of market dominance, x-inefficiency, etc etc…

Then there is the counter-argument which posits ideas such as monopolies are “good” as they allow higher supernormal profits, which can be used for R&D to create more innovative products, which are of a higher quality etc.

Here is an interesting article in the Financial Times by John Kay that looks at the issue of monopoly from a novel perspective, applied to the television industry through the example of the book industry; and looks at the issue of allowing more competition.  More competition and choice may not always be better for the consumer, since with more competition comes a desire to chase market share at the expense of quality.

Rate this article:   

Print RSS Tweet This!


ECONOMICS TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER

Join over 4,000 other Economics Teachers in the UK and around the world who receive the tutor2u Economics Resource Email newsletter. Get special offers, first news of latest resources, teaching ideas, conferences and workshops.

*  Your Email Address:
*  Preferred Format:
    AS/A2 Economics Board:
    GCSE Economics Board:
*  Country:
    Full Name:
    Job / Position:
    Postcode:
    School / College:
    Town / City:
*  Enter the security code shown:



Recent Threads on the Economics Teacher Discussion Forums:
Posts in: General Economics Teaching

Need help. - Economic Growth
Economies of scale presentation A2
Economic development
International Competitiveness
Keynesian Aggregate Supply
Demand Supply (% VAT Imposed) How to...?
Policy conflict and the Euro
Registering for the tutor2u VLU
Video Case-study - lunchtime prices slashed
Long Exam Example to Use for Revision Please?





Comments

Most Popular Topic Tags on the Economics Blog

recession, demand, economics, unemployment, prices, price, inflation, investment, costs, trade, profit, employment, debt, supply, downturn, euro, gdp, confidence, competition, risk, china, capacity, exports, production, incentives, oil, expectations, manufacturing, sterling, housing, pay, food, profits, banks, tutor2u, globalisation, mortgage, property, revision, retailers, slowdown, borrowing, usa, innovation, emissions, dollar, deflation, airlines, supermarkets, entrepreneur, monopsony, efficiency, productivity, google, elasticity, moodle, wealth, aqa, keynes, protectionism, welfare, consumption, externalities, saving, opec, economist, inequality, strategy, depression, competitiveness, economic cycle, tim harford, stocks, depreciation, jobs, monopoly, infrastructure, carbon, credit crunch, poverty, cars, eu, bank of england, vle, environmental, carbon trading, spare capacity, budget deficit, environment, subsidy, wages, market failure, regulation, management, evaluation, output gap, losses, behavioural, government failure, steel, climate change, construction, macroeconomics, imports, oligopoly, japan, bbc, skills, cpi, commodities, farming, newsnight, paul mason, fiscal stimulus, intervention, multiplier effect, single market, currencies, population, stagflation, contestable, itunes, lse, agflation, minimum wage, interest rates, choices, aviation, amazon, quantitative easing, taxes, germany, uk economy, monetary policy, cartel, survey, nationalisation, india, brazil, rpi, pricing, dan ariely, opportunity cost, apple, pollution, oecd, rationality, keynes society, rsa, relative poverty, shipping, iphone, capital, merger, currency, imf, balance of payments, yuan, tragedy of the commons, price discrimination, current account, economies of scale, redundancies, london, facebook, savings, stakeholders, shareholder, behavioural economics, mpc, supply chain, liquidity, takeover, barriers to entry, reputation, income elasticity, poverty trap, microsoft, hamish mcrae, human capital, subsidies, discrimination, roger bootle, federal reserve, duopoly, robert peston, immigration, suppliers, us economy, quiz, gini coefficient, collapse, pensions, coffee, obama, development, national debt, consumer surplus, crowding out, etonomics, eurozone, crude oil, scarcity, labour market, ecb, petrol, taxation, tesco, free, brand, budget, paradox of thrift, smoking, transport, cost of living, labour mobility, liquidity trap, speculation, global, starbucks, recovery, allocative efficiency, iceland, behaviour, david smith, surplus, waste, shareholders, ireland, information failure, happiness, growth, open source, vat, creative destruction, cost benefit analysis, trade deficit, tariffs, northern rock, edinburgh, comparative advantage, ownership, scrappage, robert frank, ocr economics, aggregate demand, freight, diane coyle, royal economic society,
All tags

Login to the tutor2u Moodle VLE

Latest entries

Categories

Monthly Archives

Syndicate