<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Economics</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Economics:</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/atom/" />
    <updated>2008-05-17T17:10:09Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2008, tutor2u.net</rights>
    <generator uri="http://expressionengine.com/" version="1.6.1">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:05:17</id>


    <entry>
      <title>Of lemons and light bulbs</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/of-lemons-and-light-bulbs/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1033</id>
      <published>2008-05-17T17:05:00Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-17T17:10:09Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Arthur Ma</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="Fun and Quirky!"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C167/"
        label="Fun and Quirky!" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/Miracle.jpg" />
<br />
In his book <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Everlasting-Light-Bulbs-Economics-Illuminates/dp/0954809300/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1211040787&amp;sr=8-1" title="Everlasting Light Bulbs">Everlasting Light Bulbs</a>, John Kay dispels the myth that inventors have already came up with a light bulb that lasts forever, and at a reasonable cost. However, light bulb manufacturers have always managed to keep it under covers somehow (through bribery, blackmail or even assassination in some versions of the story!) because such a light bulb would destroy the market for light bulbs and put the manufacturers out of business.&nbsp;
</p> <p>This conspiracy theory was meant to demonstrate the flaws of capitalism, how a market system does not produce the most efficient outcome (everlasting light bulbs for all). Other versions of this anti-capitalist theory include “we’ve already found the cure to cancer/AIDS/malaria/etc. but the formula has been suppressed to profit pharmaceutical companies, so people are dying needlessly”. However, in his original 1999 article <a href="http://www.johnkay.com/in_action/37" title="here">here</a>, John manages to argue successfully that such a situation cannot exist by running through all three possibilities: in perfect competition, a monopoly/cartel, and anywhere in between. The only possible conclusion he draws is that such a light bulb has either not been invented yet or is too expensive to be marketed.
</p>
<p>
However, new evidence appears on the horizon, showing that everything may not work as smoothly as John had hypothesised. A few weeks ago, the BBC ran a piece on “<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7367548.stm" title="the miracle berry">the miracle berry</a>”, a berry that makes everything you eat for the next half hour taste sweet. Because it is a fruit, it has close to zero calories. Now imagine how much of an impact it would have upon a world where diabetes and obesity are becoming overwhelming issues. Being direct substitutes, it would invalidate any need for sugars or artificial sweeteners, the latter almost always providing an unpleasant aftertaste.
</p>
<p>
The surprising thing is that it has been discovered by the West since the 1960s. A fruit with such potential health benefits, why have we never seen it on the market? That’s because on the eve of its commercial launch in 1974, the US Food and Drugs Administration declared it as a food additive which required several more years of extensive testing. That essentially forced the then enterprising company, Miralin, out of business as it had neither the money nor the time to invest into such ventures. Though the FDA has always denied that it was pressurised into the move by “Big Sugar” industries, there have been evidence of sabotage and burglary. 
</p>
<p>
So what happened here? What was the discrepancy between John’s theory and Miralin’s reality? Were the transaction costs simply too great? Miralin did not rent out its services as John had predicted it would, would appeasing the sugar industries have achieved a better result? I guess we’ll never know. The miracle berry is still in a stasis of regulatory limbo in the US – it’s perfectly legal to grow and sell it, but its usage as a food additive is heavily regulated by the FDA. Thankfully, Japanese scientists have managed to extract the miraculin (the rogue glycoprotein which tricks the tastebuds into believing sour foods are actually sweet) and have been marketing it in special <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/nov/25/japan.foodanddrink" title="Miracle Fruits cafés">Miracle Fruits cafés</a>. Akerlof’s market for lemons has never been so buoyant. 
</p>
<p>
Certainly puts a new spin on the saying “when life gives you lemons, make lemonade”!
</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>All hands to the pumps?</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/all-hands-to-the-pumps/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1032</id>
      <published>2008-05-17T10:29:01Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-17T10:36:35Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="AS Micro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C60/"
        label="AS Micro" />
      <category term="Oil and Gas"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C156/"
        label="Oil and Gas" />
      <category term="Prices &#45; Supply and Demand"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C166/"
        label="Prices &#45; Supply and Demand" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/saudi_oil_output.gif" width="514" height="375" />
</p>
<p>
The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/be0d6daa-2347-11dd-b214-000077b07658.html" title="Financial Times reports today ">Financial Times reports today </a>that Saudi Arabia is stepping up crude oil production by 300,000 barrels a day. And there are signs that other members of OPEC are starting to press for an increase in OPEC oil output as prices rise above $127 per barrel and the steep rise in oil costs hurts many developing countries. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/059a9de2-23a1-11dd-b214-000077b07658.html" title="This FT article ">This FT article </a>provides a bit more background on some of the tensions within the cartel. Saudi Arabia is often called a swing producer within the OPEC cartel - adjusting short run production to help the cartel meet its price targets / objectives. It seems that <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article3950658.ece" title="Saudi is justifying the new boost to output ">Saudi is justifying the new boost to output </a>on the grounds of compensating for reductions in production from other OPEC members. Goldman Sachs has raised its average price projection for crude in 2009 to $148 a barrel.
</p>
 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Will food prices start to fall?</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/will-food-prices-start-to-fall/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1031</id>
      <published>2008-05-17T10:24:00Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-17T10:27:45Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="AS Micro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C60/"
        label="AS Micro" />
      <category term="Commodities Markets"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C198/"
        label="Commodities Markets" />
      <category term="Prices &#45; Supply and Demand"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C166/"
        label="Prices &#45; Supply and Demand" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/commodity_prices_may_08.gif" width="514" height="375" />
</p>
<p>
Hugh Pym reports on a <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7404107.stm" title="decline in the index of global food prices ">decline in the index of global food prices </a>which hints that the recent upwards spiral in the cost of foodstuffs might be coming to an end. Have the underlying supply and demand factors changed? Will food producers around the world respond to the sharp rise in price to give us a supply response large enough to lower the risks of further social and economic upheaval?
</p>
 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Flood defences, cost benefit and opportunity cost</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/flood-defences-cost-benefit-and-opportunity-cost/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1030</id>
      <published>2008-05-17T09:08:00Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-17T10:39:28Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="A2 Micro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C61/"
        label="A2 Micro" />
      <category term="AS Micro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C60/"
        label="AS Micro" />
      <category term="Market Failure"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C19/"
        label="Market Failure" />
      <category term="Public Goods"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C171/"
        label="Public Goods" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/flood_defence.jpg" width="506" height="338" />
</p>
<p>
Money spent on flood defences both here in the UK and overseas raises plenty of interesting questions relating to the use of cost benefit analysis and the opportunity cost of public money. What are the external costs and benefits of flood defence schemes? Are flood fences a pure public good? Who should pay for them? There have been several excellent news articles and video clips on this issue on the BBC web site in recent days - here is a selection
</p>
 <p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/7402996.stm" title="Coast cannot be completely saved ">Coast cannot be completely saved </a>
<br />
The Environment Agency has said it has not been given enough money to defend the whole East Anglian coast from flooding over the next 100 years
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7386383.stm" title="Flood risk fear over key UK sites ">Flood risk fear over key UK sites </a>
<br />
Hundreds of UK power substations and water treatment plants are potentially at risk from flooding, a confidential government study suggests
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7243577.stm" title="UK ill-prepared against floods">UK ill-prepared against floods</a>
<br />
The UK&#8217;s weather forecasting needs to be improved, according to the man leading a government review into last summer&#8217;s downpours
</p>

      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Revision: AQA Unit 3 Housing Test</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/revision-aqa-unit-3-housing-test/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1029</id>
      <published>2008-05-17T09:03:00Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-17T09:06:07Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="Housing Market"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C9/"
        label="Housing Market" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>I drafted a test paper on housing for my AS students yesterday - it is not quite a full paper as they only had a 40 minute lesson to complete it. But here it is in word format together with a suggested mark scheme. The students then marked eachother&#8217;s work and commented on it using the mark scheme - a useful exercise.
</p>
<p>
Test Paper
<br />
<a href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/Housing_Market_Test.doc">Housing_Market_Test.doc</a>
</p>
<p>
Mark Scheme
<br />
<a href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/Housing_Test_Examiners_Mark_Scheme.doc">Housing_Test_Examiners_Mark_Scheme.doc</a>
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Ten Thoughts on Improving Your Economics Papers</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/ten-thoughts-on-improving-your-economics-papers/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1028</id>
      <published>2008-05-16T14:07:01Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-16T14:13:38Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="Teaching of Economics"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C24/"
        label="Teaching of Economics" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/exam_prep.jpg" width="505" height="334" />
</p>
<p>
I gave a presentation to my AS and A2 students this afternoon on some ideas for improving the overall content of their answers in the forthcoming economics exams. I have attached it as a PowerPoint file - there are no snazzy graphics or images - just a series of slides containing some personal thoughts on building extra concepts into answers. The PowerPoint doesn&#8217;t include the many examples we looked at for each section but it might be useful to some for revision.
</p>
<p>
PowerPoint
<br />
<a href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/10_Ways_to_Turn_a_Good_Paper_into.ppt">10_Ways_to_Turn_a_Good_Paper_into_a_very_Good_one</a>
</p>
 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Canny pricing in a slowdown</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/canny-pricing-in-a-slowdown/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1027</id>
      <published>2008-05-16T12:57:00Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-16T13:03:39Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="A2 Micro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C61/"
        label="A2 Micro" />
      <category term="AS Micro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C60/"
        label="AS Micro" />
      <category term="Business Economics"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C22/"
        label="Business Economics" />
      <category term="Price Discrimination"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C181/"
        label="Price Discrimination" />
      <category term="Recession Watch!"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C203/"
        label="Recession Watch!" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>There is a super feature on pricing strategies from Adam Jones&#8217;s management blog on the Financial Times web site  - <a href="http://blogs.ft.com/management/2008/05/15/managing-in-hard-times-getting-the-price-right/" title="available here">available here</a>
</p>
<p>
Canny businesses are willing and able to adjust their pricing strategies to suit ever changing business consumers. The key seems to be in having good market intelligence about which consumers have a demand that is sensitive to price and those who spending on goods and services is affected more by changes in real take-home income. Deep discounting is often observed in an economic slowdown or outright recession as businesses look to shift unsold stock, maintain sales volumes and generate extra cash to tide them through the tough times. But as the FT blog points out, offering discounts to consumers can risk unleashing an unwelcome price war (which damages profit margins) and overly-aggressive discounting can ultimately damage the brand.
</p>
<p>
There is a bit more on pricing do&#8217;s and don&#8217;ts in a recession <a href="http://www.businessknowhow.com/money/recessionpricing.htm" title="here">here</a>
</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Dismal prediction for Zimbabwe proves accurate</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/dismal-prediction-for-zimbabwe-proves-accurate/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1024</id>
      <published>2008-05-15T14:42:00Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-15T18:34:10Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Tom White</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="Inflation"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C164/"
        label="Inflation" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>In the blog I suggested that without the hasty departure of the tyrant Robert Mugabe, things would get worse.&nbsp; Back in April, the Bank of Zimbabwe had just issued a 10m Zimbabwe dollar note.&nbsp; I predicted a billion dollar note in a couple of months.
</p>
<p>
Unfortunately, it’s looking like my gloomy prediction may prove true.&nbsp; Today the BBC report that <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/7402943.stm" title="Zimbabwe bank issues $500m note">Zimbabwe bank issues $500m note</a>.&nbsp; That’s worth a couple of bucks.&nbsp; So a billion Zim dollars is equivalent to around five US dollars. For now.
<br />

</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Ricardo Rules OK?</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/ricardo-rules-ok/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1023</id>
      <published>2008-05-15T12:36:01Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-15T12:47:38Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="A2 Macro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C62/"
        label="A2 Macro" />
      <category term="AS Macro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C59/"
        label="AS Macro" />
      <category term="Fiscal Policy"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C46/"
        label="Fiscal Policy" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/ricardo_rules_ok.gif" width="471" height="359" />
</p>
<p>
This week&#8217;s newspaper headlines have been dominated by the £2.7 bn tax bribe (whoops .... tax adjustment) announced by the embattled Chancellor Alastair Darling to compensate for the fiasco over the abolition of the 10% starting rate of income tax. The FT this morning linked the economic effects of this tax cut to one of the most celebrated and controversial ideas of moden macroeconomics - Ricardian equivalence theory ..... how sexy does macroeconomics get!
</p> <p>Do taxpayers increase their consumption of goods and services when the government offers a tax rebate or tax reduction that boosts their disposable income? 
</p>
<p>
This question is of real relevance to the economic issues of the moment. In the United States, the Bush administration has introduced a $150bn tax rebate scheme designed to bolster domestic demand during the fallout from the credit crunch and sub-prime crisis. And in the UK, Darling has injected a more modest £2.7bn by announcing a £600 increase in the value of the income-tax free allowance. Estimates are that the tax giveaway will cause anyone earning up to £40,835 to gain £120 this year. This is worth around 0.3% of household incomes. 
</p>
<p>
Some economists are deeply sceptical that such fiscal measures have much impact on domestic demand for goods and services. What might happen if people regard these tax cuts as merely temporary and expect them to be reversed or clawed back pretty quickly? Darling has said that the extra £2.7bn will be funded by a rise in government borrowing (a higher than expected budget deficit) - but do unfunded tax cuts actually work?
</p>
<p>
Not according to the Ricardian equivalence theory.
</p>
<p>
As an article by Chris Giles in the FT states:
</p>
<p>
<i>&#8220;The theory, although more closely associated with professor <a href="http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/barro.htm " title="Robert Barro ">Robert Barro </a>in the 1970s, suggests that unfunded tax cuts will have no effect on spending because the public know they will be taxed in future to pay for current government largesse.&#8221;</i>
</p>
<p>
Windfall gains are just that - one-off reductions in our tax bills that will not be repeated year-in-year-out. Canny taxpayers will expect the government to claw back the revenue in other ways - there are plenty of new or existing stealth taxes they can tweak. And in the current climate, with rising food and utility bills and falling house prices, much of the extra income will disappear either in meeting double-digit increases in energy prices. Or in saving a little more to repair household finances that are coming under intense pressure.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/82ab32cc-220e-11dd-a50a-000077b07658.html" title="The rest of the FT article is here">The rest of the FT article is here</a>
</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>10p tax row additional</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/10p-tax-row/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1022</id>
      <published>2008-05-15T11:47:01Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-15T11:58:30Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Ian Black</name>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Hello all
</p>
<p>
Just a quickie from me. Found that many of my U6b economists were unsure on the meaning and implications of the 10p tax row. So I designed a very quick guide using a couple of examples: thought you may find it useful. I make no promises that tax thresholds and calculations are 100% accurate: just like the Treasury, in other words! Feel free to mess around with, change examples, raise font size etc, it was all done on the hoof on the board in a lesson!
</p>
<p>
Ian
</p>
<p>
PS not sure if the attachment worked on the last one, so I have put contents into extended text
</p> <p>1)	March 2007 Tax Rates at 2008-9 thresholds
</p>
<p>
Tax Thresholds (gross income)	Tax Rate
</p>
<p>
0-5435					0%
<br />
5436-7755				10%
<br />
7756-41435				22%
<br />
41436-					40%
</p>

<p>
Mr Bloggs earns £30,000/year. His income tax bill is £2,320*10/100=£232
<br />
                                                                                     +22245*22/100=£4893.90
<br />
	=£5125.90
</p>
<p>
Mr Small earns £12,000/year. His income tax bill is £2,320*10/100=£232
<br />
							+4245*22/100=£933.90
<br />
							=£1165.90
</p>
<p>
2)     May 2008 Tax Rates at 2008-9 thresholds
</p>
<p>
Tax Thresholds (gross income)	Tax Rate
<br />
0-5435                                                   0%
<br />
5436-41435                                           20%
<br />
41436-                                                   40%
</p>
<p>
Mr Bloggs new tax bill is				£24,564*20/100=£4912.80
</p>
<p>
Mr Small’s new tax bill is					£6564*20/100 = £1312.80
</p>
<p>
As a result of the abolition of the 10p tax threshold, and the cut in the basic rate of income tax of 2%, Mr Bloggs is over £200/year better off, whereas Mr Small is nearly £150 worse off.
</p>
<p>
3)	New proposal: £600 increase in personal tax free allowance and cut in 40% threshold by £600
</p>
<p>
Tax Thresholds (gross income)	Tax Rate
<br />
0-6035                                                   0%
<br />
6035-41435                                           20%
<br />
40836-                                                   40%
</p>
<p>
Mr Blogg’s new tax bill is			£23,965*20/100= £4793
<br />
Mr Small’s new tax bill is			£5,965*20/100= £1193
</p>
<p>
Mr Small has recouped most of what he had lost, but Mr Bloggs has also gained!
<br />

</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>NICE decade is over</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/nice-decade-is-over/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1021</id>
      <published>2008-05-14T17:43:00Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-14T17:49:38Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="A2 Macro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C62/"
        label="A2 Macro" />
      <category term="AS Macro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C59/"
        label="AS Macro" />
      <category term="Cycles and Shocks"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C207/"
        label="Cycles and Shocks" />
      <category term="Inflation"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C164/"
        label="Inflation" />
      <category term="Recession Watch!"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C203/"
        label="Recession Watch!" />
      <category term="UK Economy"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C4/"
        label="UK Economy" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/stagflation_may_08.gif" width="506" height="369" />
</p>
<p>
Mervyn King declared that the NICE decade was formally over in his Inflation Report published today – NICE stood for non-inflationary continuous expansion (a good term to use in the exam) – but the combination of sharply rising food, energy and fuel prices is driving inflation higher whilst contributing to a fall in real incomes and a wider economic slowdown. 
<br />

</p> <p>Will we suffer from a nasty bout of stagflation? This was discussed in the Independent this morning <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/the-spectre-of-stagflation-827745.html" title="in an article by Sean O’Grady">in an article by Sean O’Grady</a>. There was actually a better article by Hamish McRae in the same paper which took a longer term view about the likely path for living standards over the next decade or so.
</p>
<p>
I have reproduced some of it below because Hamish is very good at capturing important developments and putting them into context – if you can do the same over the next couple of weeks, you will surely get the dividend from a keen eyed examiner!
</p>
<p>
Hamish writes:
</p>
<p>
<i>“We are accustomed to a world where natural resources are reasonably plentiful and reasonably cheap. Within the West we have until recently had an increasing workforce. And we have had steady gains in productivity. As a result, living standards have risen pretty steadily every year, with only occasional blips during global downturns.”
</p>
<p>
“We are now starting to see a different sort of downturn. We cannot assume that natural resources will be either plentiful or cheap, given the growth that is taking place in the developing world, particularly in China but also in India. We won&#8217;t have an increasing workforce for much longer – in Germany it is already shrinking – and that smaller workforce will have to support a growing number of pensioners. And while it should be possible to keep increasing productivity, it will be much harder to do so as the weight of our economies shifts from manufacturing to services. You can run car plants with fewer people and still produce good cars but it is hard to runs schools, hospitals and care homes with smaller staffs, or at least to run them well. Something has to give, and that something is the rate at which living standards can rise.”</i>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/hamish-mcrae/hamish-mcrae-we-can-take-it-but-it-wont-be-much-fun-827652.html" title="The rest of the article is here">The rest of the article is here</a>
</p>
<p>
<img src="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/west_texas_may_08.gif" width="506" height="369" />
</p>
<p>
Martin Wolf <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/219fcbde-2108-11dd-a0e6-000077b07658.html" title="also writes in the FT today ">also writes in the FT today </a>about how we should adjust to a world where oil is no longer cheap. Again, if you have a few minutes this is worth reading through
<br />

</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>One Million Blog Views</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/one-million-blog-views/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1020</id>
      <published>2008-05-14T17:30:00Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-14T17:31:09Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p>Since the new blogs were launched at the start of February we have been delighted to see the average daily page views climbing. And this morning we reach one million blog page views! Thanks to all.
<br />

</p> 
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Mervyn faces the Music</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/mervyn-faces-the-music/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1019</id>
      <published>2008-05-14T17:23:00Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-14T17:27:38Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="A2 Macro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C62/"
        label="A2 Macro" />
      <category term="AS Macro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C59/"
        label="AS Macro" />
      <category term="Monetary Policy"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C7/"
        label="Monetary Policy" />
      <category term="UK Economy"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C4/"
        label="UK Economy" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/inflation_projection.gif" width="500" height="401" />
</p>
<p>
The Governor and his colleagues faced the press yesterday at the launch of the <a href="http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/inflationreport/irlatest.htm" title="quarterly inflation report ">quarterly inflation report </a>.... here is a selection of comments from them from questions fired from economics journalists, there is some great evaluation in here for AS and A2 economics students!
<br />

</p> <p><b>Bank of England Inflation Report - May 2008</b>
</p>
<p>
Inflation conditions have deteriorated in the last three months as cost-push factors have become more severe:
<br />
Oil prices have doubled (modest increase in oil supply relative to strong growth of global demand; oil in non-OPEC countries is harder to extract)
<br />
Gas prices have doubled
<br />
Food prices have risen by 60% (more reasonable to expect a supply-response to higher food prices in the next year or two)
<br />
Higher prices are squeezing real take home pay which may cause a sharp slowdown in output
</p>
<p>
Commercial property and housing prices are falling sharply
<br />
The savings ratio is likely to rise as the economy re-balances towards saving and exports and away from consumption and imports - this rise in household saving will be reflected in weaker consumer spending on goods and services
</p>
<p>
<b>Comments to journalist questions</b>
</p>
<p>
<i>Life outside the City: </i>
<br />
Economic conditions and confidence outside of London and the financial/property sector is extremely marked - but the squeeze on real incomes will affect spending power right across the economy
</p>
<p>
<i>Inflation targets:</i>
<br />
Changing the inflation target does nothing to change the dilemma of slowing growth and rising inflation resulting from price-level shocks from the rest of the world. &#8220;This is not the moment to change the inflation target&#8221; ... but maybe this is the time to start thinking of how to introduce asset prices into the inflation measurement.
</p>
<p>
<i>Wealth effect and consumer spending:</i>
<br />
Investment in housing is falling back as house prices fall but not as much as we are seeing in the United States
<br />
There is no direct causal link between house prices and consumer spending .... it depends on the other macro conditions (3rd factors) prevailing at the time - for example people&#8217;s expectations of their future incomes
<br />
The change in the availability and price of credit is an important factor causing a slowdown in consumer confidence and spending
<br />
Housing repossessions remain well below where they were the last time the housing market was in recession (early 1990s)
</p>
<p>
<i>Wages and Prices - risks of a wage-price spiral:</i>
<br />
Falling real incomes might at some point provoke a reaction leading to a rise in wage claims - the BoE is concerned to avoid this
<br />
But there is less chance of this during an economic slowdown when people are concerned about their jobs
</p>
<p>
<i>Depreciation of the pound and the effect on inflation:</i>
<br />
Will the fall in the value of sterling against the euro cause a rise in inflation?
<br />
A lower pound increases the cost of imports - will they be passed through into higher consumer prices?
</p>
<p>
Further coverage of the Inflation Report <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7400074.stm" title="is available here">is available here</a>
</p>

      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Surge in UK inflation</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/surge-in-uk-inflation/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1012</id>
      <published>2008-05-13T19:03:01Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-14T06:41:54Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Geoff Riley</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="A2 Macro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C62/"
        label="A2 Macro" />
      <category term="AS Macro"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C59/"
        label="AS Macro" />
      <category term="Inflation"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C164/"
        label="Inflation" />
      <category term="UK Economy"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C4/"
        label="UK Economy" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/inflation_header.gif" width="500" height="375" />
</p>
<p>
The latest figures for consumer price inflation were far worse that expected. Consumer prices increased by 0.8% in April taking the annual rate of inflation to 3.0% - right at the top of the level allowed by the government as part of the inflation target. Both goods and service price inflation moved higher as the UK economy struggles under a series of cost-push inflationary pressures. I have attached a PowerPoint file showing some of the key inflation charts.
<br />

</p> <p>Annual CPI inflation jumped to 3.0% in April (2.5% in March)
<br />
Rise in inflation for both goods and services
<br />
Very steep increase in producer input costs
<br />
Now showing through in producer prices
<br />
Severe cost push inflationary pressures
<br />
Rising oil prices (now > $127 per barrel)
<br />
Food price inflation (agflation)
<br />
Falling pound against the Euro
<br />
Rising inflation in China and other emerging countries
</p>
<p>
PowerPoint File on UK inflation
<br />
<a href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/files/Inflation_Surge.ppt">Inflation_Surge.ppt</a>
</p>

      ]]></content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Learning Lessons from: The Simpsons</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/learning-lessons-from-the-simpsons/" />
      <id>tag:tutor2u.net,2008:blog/index.php/economics/2.1011</id>
      <published>2008-05-13T16:48:01Z</published>
      <updated>2008-05-13T16:53:34Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Arthur Ma</name>
                  </author>

      <category term="Fun and Quirky!"
        scheme="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/C167/"
        label="Fun and Quirky!" />
      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        <p><img src="http://www.lardlad.com/assets/episodes/season8/4f02-big.jpg" />
<br />
Back to the <a href="http://else.econ.ucl.ac.uk/orsee/public/" title="econ lab at UCL">econ lab at UCL</a>, and this time the experiment was mercifully short, unlike <a href="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/index.php/economics/comments/922/" title="Experiment 11">Experiment 11</a> which I participated in last time. This one was a market research experiment, a lot more enjoyable but also less wholesome to pick apart.&nbsp;
</p> <p>Part A took us to a website with 20 digital cameras on it. The website had 6 specifications for each camera: price, weight, digital zoom, optical zoom, pixel size, screen size. We weren’t allowed to take notes (every detail had to be done by recall) but we had as much time as we needed to browse through as much (or as little) of the selection as we wanted. We told that we had the option of buying one of these cameras at the end, and the econ lab will pay £20 towards it!
</p>
<p>
Being the poor student type, I mainly focused on the price. I found myself trying to save time by screening out any digital cameras over £100 and not learning any of the specifications. This came to be a problem when they started asking me multiple choice questions on the cameras’ specifications, how sure I was of my choice and how much I liked each camera. In the end I narrowed it down to the cheapest camera I could find, a <a href="http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=11576&amp;pq-locale=en_GB" title="Kodak Easyshare C713">Kodak Easyshare C713</a> (not an endorsement in any way <img src="http://www.tutor2u.net/blog/images/smileys/raspberry.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="raspberry" style="border:0;" />) which I thought was very reasonable at the reduced price of £40.
</p>
<p>
So after getting paid to buy a digital camera, I wondered what was my next challenge. I actually laughed out loud when they told me that Part B involved watching an episode of The Simpsons (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0779678/" title="Treehouse of Horror VII">Treehouse of Horror VII</a> for the hardcore fans). There were two commercial breaks between the mini-stories and we had a button for skipping to the next commercial if we wanted, but the commercial breaks were for a fixed time so you couldn’t actually fast forward. Now I have to admit, the commercials they selected were actually good, I haven’t seen any of them before and I only used the skip button twice. 
</p>
<p>
At the end I had to recall as many brand names as possible which were advertised during the commercial break, which was surprisingly difficult despite the quality of the commercials. Then I was tested on a list of brand names, whether their ad came up during the commercial break, how attractive it is to me and how likely I am to buy their product during the next three years. It all felt very market research rather than economics, but I don’t mind, this is the dream job: getting paid to watch commercials!
</p>
<p>
Part C was very short, there were 10 Mini Coopers (same model, different colours) on show and we had to guess the market share of each colour. I think it mainly focused on whether people preferred cars with different coloured roofs to bodies or the same, but after estimating some numbers it seemed like I preferred roofs to be the same colour as the body. 
</p>
<p>
The final part (I’m pretty sure the four parts had nothing to do with each other) tested us on whether we preferred/trusted reviews of products with star grades out of 5 or generic comments in words such as “I am very happy with this product”. I would’ve thought that the two methods of communicating satisfaction were the same to me but I found myself giving more weighting to the worded comments, despite how generic they are. 
</p>
<p>
An interesting one and a half hours, even better that I was getting paid for it. Market research like this is vital in figuring out pricing strategies, aesthetics and advertising. Hell, people often don’t even know what they want for themselves, much less others. As I always say, <b>“Supply is a science, demand is the art.”</b>
</p>
<p>
[Editor’s note: this is the eighth instalment of the Learning Lessons series, detailing the author’s exploits on the London lecture circuit. For further information or to subscribe to the mailing list, contact ]
</p>
      ]]></content>
    </entry>


</feed>