Q&A - Explain the four main leadership styles

Leaders exercise their authority in different ways.  In doing so, they are said to exhibit a “leadership style”.  Leadership styles are essentially about:

• The way that the functions of leadership are carried out
• The way that a leader behaves

There has been substantial research into the types and effectiveness of various leadership styles, with the four most common generally accepted to be:

The key features of each of these leadership styles can be summarised as follows:

Authoritarian:
- Autocratic leaders hold onto as much power and decision-making as possible
- Focus of power is with the manager
- Communication is top-down & one-way
- Formal systems of command & control
- Minimal consultation
- Use of rewards & penalties
- Very little delegation
- McGregor Theory X approach
- Most likely to be used when subordinates are unskilled, not trusted and their ideas are not valued Leader decides what is best for employees

Paternalistic:
- Links with Mayo – addressing employee needs
- Akin to a parent/child relationship – where the leader is seen as a “father-figure”
- Still little delegation
- A softer form of authoritarian leadership, which often results in better employee motivation and lower staff turnover
- Typical paternalistic leader explains the specific reason as to why he has taken certain actions

Democratic:
- Focus of power is more with the group as a whole
- Leadership functions are shared within the group
- Employees have greater involvement in decision-making – but potentially this slows-down decision-making
- Emphasis on delegation and consultation – but the leader still has the final say
- Perhaps the most popular leadership style because of the positive emotional connotations of acting democratically
- A potential trade-off between speed of decision-making and better motivation and morale?
- Likely to be most effective when used with skilled, free-thinking and experienced subordinates

Laissez-faire:
- Laissez-faire means to “leave alone”
- Leader has little input into day-to-day decision-making
- Conscious decision to delegate power
- Managers / employees have freedom to do what they think is best
- Often criticised for resulting in poor role definition for managers
- Effective when staff are ready and willing to take on responsibility, they are motivated, and can be trusted to do their jobs
- Importantly, laissez-faire is not the same as abdication

As a generalisation, in the UK there has been a gradual shift away from autocratic leadership.  Possible reasons for this include:

• Changes in society’s values
• Better educated workforce
• Focus on need for soft HR skills
• Changing workplace organisation
• Greater workplace legislation
• Pressure for greater employee involvement

Rated: (4/5), based on 2 reviews

BUSINESS TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER
Get first news of business teaching resources, ideas and other materials from tutor2u. Over 5,000 business teachers from the UK and around the world receive our regular teacher email newsletters. Sign up for free here!

Comments