AQA BUSS1 & BUSS2 Feedback from AQA
Recommend on Google+
I thought I might share my notes from the recent AQA online CPD session which provided feedback on the Summer 2011 AS exams. I think I managed to note down most of the main points. Hopefully useful for students preparing for BUSS1 this week.
BUSS1 / BUSS2 Results Data for Summer 2011
10.3% of students got a A grade at AS
27.9% of students got A or B at AS
Boundary marks were:
BUSS1: (our of 60)
Grade A: 42
Grade B: 37
Grade C: 32
Grade D: 27
Grade E: 22
BUSS2: (our of 77*)
Grade A: 54
Grade B: 49
Grade C: 45
Grade D: 41
Grade E: 37
* One of the rogue questions (1c) was not marked
BUSS1 Feedback
Overall comments:
- Distinct trend that students are applying their understanding much better.
- Question 2a is the analysis question in BUSS1 and this was much better answered than previously
- More than any paper - lots of use of the case study; students picking up the clues in the case
- Examiners now looking to set questions that integrate numeric and literacy skills
- E.g. Question 2c - the best way to provide a focused answer was to use the data in the case study - using calculations to support the argument
- Breakeven is proving much better for students - after a period of difficulty
- Still too many careless errors - candidates get good marks for showing working out
- Depth of analysis - better, but still looking for improvement
What students did well in BUSS1
- Effective use of the case study to ensure answers were applied
- Excellent use of calculations to support arguments in Q. 2(c)
- Improved accuracy in calculations
- Clearer showing of ‘working out’ where calculations were used
- Some improvement in the depth of analysis in longer questions
What features are characteristic of a A Grade student paper in BUSS1?
- Quality, not quantity of points made - depth rather than breadth
- Don’t try to use all the data
- Students should pick only 2-3 arguments that they want to make
- Demonstrates decent understanding of business concepts - but a comment from the examiner that this aspect has worsened in recent years, as illustrated by poorer quality of definitions used in answers
- Good answer recognise that the skill of application is the key step to evaluation
- Judgements have to be consistent with the evidence presented in the points raised
Where students could do better in BUSS1
- Analysis too often superficial and the logical development of an argument not evidenced, even when logic was simple
- Definitions too vague: “‘Knowledge’ is a declining skill amongst mid-level candidates”
- Still some some generic responses - no reference to the case
- Irrelevant answers as a result of careless reading of the question + superfluous responses (e.g. analysing benefits AND drawbacks when only benefits were required)
- Candidates chose too many arguments - and didn’t develop them properly
How can higher level students do even better in BUSS1?
- Don’t be afraid to ask for (and use) additional sheets if time permits: get the additional sheets handed out early
- Go back and supplement an answer if there is time; the 3rd argument might be better than the 1st or 2nd
- Practice what students can actually write in a 90 minute exam
- Whole mocks are crucial to develop good timing technique - don’t just rely on setting timed questions individually
- BUSS1 examiner is trying to move away from disembodied calculations. Trying to encourage students to use data as well as words in their answers - particularly in the higher mark questions
BUSS2 Feedback
Overall comments:
- No comments on the exam paper fiasco / rogue questions!
- A distinct improvement in student performance in BUSS2 - much better reading & interpreting the questions
- Better use of counter-arguments
- Clear evidence that evaluation is a skill that has improved considerably in recent years
- BUSS2 is synoptic (in the sense that it covers the whole AS). In revision, teachers should focus on the two integrating, synoptic topic areas of the specification – ‘competitiveness’ and ‘increasing profit’
- Centres should encourage students to read / discuss topical business events. “Most situations in exam papers have parallels in real-life”
- Worthwhile practising integrating “numerical and literate information” in responses (examiners looking for this as evidence of high level analysis)
What students did well in BUSS2
- Questions answered directly and relevantly
- Better support for judgements expressed - moved candidates up from E1 to E2 and E3
- Good use, when appropriate of arguments and counter arguments: results in balanced & developed responses
- Good use of case study context
- Good understanding of concepts like cash flow and suppliers
What were the features of strong (A grade) BUSS2 papers?
- Context of case study used well to develop clear lines of argument
- Only 2 or 3 well-developed arguments in the longer questions
- Key business concepts: demonstrated clear understanding
- Evaluation was supported by the case study evidence used
- Accurate calculations
- Answers clearly planned to respond to the questions set
Some areas of weakness in BUSS2 candidates
- BUSS2 case studies designed to allow several possible arguments - 3-5 potential lines of thought that can be pursued.
- Look out for what is important - and focus on these
- Practice the interpretation of calculations - what does the result mean and what are the implications?
- Competitiveness - candidates don’t really understand this issue
- Delegation - being confused with decentralisation
blog comments powered by Disqus
BUSINESS TEACHER RESOURCE NEWSLETTER
Get first news of business teaching resources, ideas and other materials from tutor2u. Over 9,400 business teachers from the UK and around the world receive our regular teacher email newsletters. Sign up for free here!



